A trade-off between conservation, development, and tourism in the vicinity of the Andasibe-Mantadia National Park, Madagascar

被引:0
作者
Thorkil Casse
Manitra Harison Razafintsalama
Anders Milhøj
机构
[1] Department of Social Sciences and Business, University of Roskilde, Roskilde
[2] Department of Forestry and Environment (ESSA-Forêt), University of Antananarivo, Antananarivo
[3] Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen
来源
SN Social Sciences | / 2卷 / 2期
关键词
Conservation; Development; Livelihoods; Madagascar; Public services; Tourism income;
D O I
10.1007/s43545-021-00309-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We investigated whether there is a trade-off between conservation and development in the vicinity of Madagascar’s largest national park (Andasibe-Mantadia). The debate on this topic in Madagascar and other countries has focused on polarized questions protecting nature and forest resources or facilitating people’s rights to exploit forest resources. The prevailing view is that both objectives cannot be achieved simultaneously and that a trade-off is inevitable. The key criterion used to select the four sites for this study was the distance from the entrance to the national park. Our survey data findings indicated that there was no correlation between restrictions on forest use and income or well-being. The villagers enjoy both direct and indirect benefits from the national park, namely the provision of jobs, electricity, water offered by the national park or by private tour operators. The national park and luxury hotels have replaced the state as service providers. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Adams W.M., Green development. Environment and sustainability in a developing world, (2009)
  • [2] Agyeman Y.B., Yeboah A.O., Ashie E., Protected areas and poverty reduction: the role of ecotourism livelihood in local communities in Ghana, Community Dev, 50, pp. 73-91, (2019)
  • [3] Bellemare M.F., Insecure land rights and share tenancy: evidence from Madagascar, Land Econ, 88, pp. 155-180, (2012)
  • [4] Bendtsen E.B., Clausen L.B.W., Hansen S.F., A review of the state-of -the- art for stakeholder analysis with regard to environmental management and regulation, J Environ Manag, (2021)
  • [5] Berkes F., Poverty reduction isn’t just about money: community perceptions of conservation benefits, Biodiversity conservation and poverty alleviation: exploring the evidence for a link, (2012)
  • [6] Blanc-Pamard C., Fauroux E., L’illusion participative: exemples Ouest-Malgaches, Autrepart, 31, pp. 3-19, (2004)
  • [7] Boney S.Z., Yiridomoh G.Y., Dayour F., Do ecotourism sites enhance rural development in Ghana? Evidence from the Weichiau community hippo sancturary project in the upper west region, WA, Ghana, J Ecotour., (2021)
  • [8] Brockington B., Wilkie D., Protected areas and poverty, Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B, 370, (2015)
  • [9] Brundtland G.H., Our common future, (1987)
  • [10] Casse T., Razafy F.L., Wurtzebach Z., Green grabbing debate and Madagascar: did we learn anything?, Int J Sustain Dev, 20, pp. 166-181, (2017)