Safety and efficacy of alternate-day corticosteroid treatment as adjunctive therapy for rheumatoid arthritis: a comparative study

被引:0
作者
Masei Suda
Sachiko Ohde
Tokutaro Tsuda
Mitsumasa Kishimoto
Masato Okada
机构
[1] St. Luke’s International University,Immuno
[2] St. Luke’s International University,Rheumatology Centre, St. Luke’s International Hospital
来源
Clinical Rheumatology | 2018年 / 37卷
关键词
Adverse events; Corticosteroids; Infection; Rheumatoid arthritis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Corticosteroids (CSs), used to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA), confer a risk of adverse events (AEs). This study investigated the safety and efficacy of alternate-day (QOD) CS therapy for RA. All patients (> 18 years) who started oral CS therapy for RA, between 2005 and 2014, at our hospital were retrospectively analysed. The patients were divided into the daily (QD) and QOD CS therapy groups to investigate the rates of CS-related major AEs (infection, diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular events and fragility fractures) within the first year of treatment. The number of patients free from CS treatment at 1 year and the mean decreases in C-reactive protein (CRP) levels at 1 month were also investigated. In total, 138 patients were analysed (QD group, 68; QOD group, 70). The maximum daily CS dose was not significantly different between the two groups, but the annual cumulative dose was significantly lower in the QOD group (P < 0.01). The infection rate was significantly lower in the QOD group (24.3%) than in the QD group (50.0%; P < 0.01), whereas the other AE rates were similar between the groups. The CS-free rate at 1 year was significantly higher in the QOD group (58.6%) than in the QD group (26.5%; P < 0.01). The mean CRP decreases over 1 month of CS therapy were not significantly different between the groups. QOD CS treatment leads to a lower infection rate and less CS dependence than does daily treatment; both RA treatments are equally effective.
引用
收藏
页码:2027 / 2034
页数:7
相关论文
共 288 条
[1]  
Makol A(2014)Time trends in glucocorticoid use in rheumatoid arthritis: results from a population-based inception cohort, 1980-1994 versus 1995-2007 Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 66 1482-1488
[2]  
Davis JM(2005)Clinical and radiographic outcomes of four different treatment strategies in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (the BeSt study): a randomized, controlled trial Arthritis Rheum 52 3381-3390
[3]  
Crowson CS(2014)Remission induction comparing infliximab and high-dose intravenous steroid, followed by treat-to-target: a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial in new-onset, treatment-naive, rheumatoid arthritis (the IDEA study) Ann Rheum Dis 73 75-85
[4]  
Therneau TM(2005)A two year randomised controlled trial of intramuscular depot steroids in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis who have shown an incomplete response to disease modifying antirheumatic drugs Ann Rheum Dis 64 1288-1293
[5]  
Gabriel SE(2012)Disease control with glucocorticoid therapy in rheumatoid arthritis Rheumatology 51 iv9-iv13
[6]  
Matteson EL(2009)Women, men, and rheumatoid arthritis: analyses of disease activity, disease characteristics, and treatments in the QUEST-RA study Arthritis Res Ther 11 R7-977
[7]  
Goekoop-Ruiterman YP(2017)EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2016 update Ann Rheum Dis 76 960-1319
[8]  
de Vries-Bouwstra JK(2010)Monitoring adverse events of low-dose glucocorticoid therapy: EULAR recommendations for clinical trials and daily practice Ann Rheum Dis 69 1913-1021
[9]  
Allaart CF(2017)Short term use of oral corticosteroids and related harms among adults in the United States: population based cohort study BMJ 357 j1415-12
[10]  
van Zeben D(2010)Patient and rheumatologist perspectives on glucocorticoids: an exercise to improve the implementation of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations on the management of systemic glucocorticoid therapy in rheumatic diseases Ann Rheum Dis 69 1015-803