Assessment of the measurement properties of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2 by applying the COSMIN methodology

被引:2
作者
Zhu, Yuanye [1 ]
Hu, Jiahui [1 ]
Ye, Weibing [1 ]
Korivi, Mallikarjuna [1 ]
Qian, Yongdong [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Normal Univ, Coll Phys Educ & Hlth Sci, Inst Human Movement & Sports Engn, Jinhua 321004, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
PDMS-2; COSMIN; Motor development; Reliability; Validity; Responsiveness; CONCURRENT VALIDITY; PRESCHOOL-CHILDREN; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; YOUNG-CHILDREN; BAYLEY-III; EDITION; RELIABILITY; TESTS;
D O I
10.1186/s13052-024-01645-6
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
The Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2 (PDMS-2) has been used to assess the gross and fine motor skills of children (0-6 years); however, the measurement properties of the PDMS-2 are inconclusive. Here, we aimed to systematically review the measurement properties of PDMS-2, and synthesize the quality of evidence using the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurements Instruments (COSMIN) methodology. Electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL and MEDLINE, were searched for relevant studies through January 2023; these studies used PDMS-2. The methodological quality of each study was assessed by the COSMIN risk-of-bias checklist, and the measurement properties of PDMS-2 were evaluated by the COSMIN quality criteria. Modified GRADE was used to evaluate the quality of the evidence. We included a total of 22 articles in the assessment. Among the assessed measurement properties, the content validity of PDMS-2 was found to be sufficient with moderate-quality evidence. The structural validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability and interrater reliability of the PDMS-2 were sufficient for high-quality evidence, while the intrarater reliability was sufficient for moderate-quality evidence. Sufficient high-quality evidence was also found for the measurement error of PDMS-2. The overall construct validity of the PDMS-2 was sufficient but showed inconsistent quality of evidence. The responsiveness of PDMS-2 appears to be sufficient with low-quality evidence. Our findings demonstrate that the PDMS-2 has sufficient content validity, structural validity, internal consistency, reliability and measurement error with moderate to high-quality evidence. Therefore, PDMS-2 is graded as 'A' and can be used in motor development research and clinical settings.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Evaluation of methods used for estimating content validity [J].
Almanasreh, Enas ;
Moles, Rebekah ;
Chen, Timothy F. .
RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2019, 15 (02) :214-221
[2]   Validation of the PDMS-2 scale in the Spanish population. Evaluation of physiotherapy intervention and parental involvement in the treatment of children with neurodevelopmental disorders [J].
Alvarez-Gonzalo, Veronica ;
Pandiella-Dominique, Andres ;
Kurlander-Arigon, Gaston ;
Simo-Segovia, Rocio ;
Caballero, Francisco F. ;
Miret, Marta .
REVISTA DE NEUROLOGIA, 2021, 73 (03) :81-88
[3]  
Boram Kim, 2021, [The Journal of Korean Academy of Sensory Integration, 대한감각통합치료학회지], V19, P32, DOI 10.18064/JKASI.2021.19.3.32
[4]  
Burns N., 1993, The practice of nursing research: Conduct, critique utilization, V4th ed
[5]  
Campbell S.K., 1993, Phys. Med. Rehabil. Clin. N. Am., V4, P541
[6]   Measurement Properties of Fine Motor Scale of Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-Second Edition A Rasch Analysis [J].
Chien, Chi-Wen ;
Bond, Trevor G. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2009, 88 (05) :376-386
[7]   Patient Reported Outcome Measures of Sleep Quality in Fibromyalgia: A COSMIN Systematic Review [J].
Climent-Sanz, Carolina ;
Marco-Mitjavila, Anna ;
Pastells-Peiro, Roland ;
Valenzuela-Pascual, Fran ;
Blanco-Blanco, Joan ;
Gea-Sanchez, Montserrat .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (09)
[8]   Concurrent Validity of the Bayley-III and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale-2 [J].
Connolly, Barbara H. ;
McClune, Nancy Oberg ;
Gatlin, Roberta .
PEDIATRIC PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2012, 24 (04) :345-352
[9]  
Connolly BH, 2006, Pediatr Phys Ther, V18
[10]  
Cools W, 2009, J SPORT SCI MED, V8, P154