Patenting propensity in the Czech Republic

被引：0
作者：
Jiří Vaněček
机构：
[1] Technology Centre of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic,
来源：
Scientometrics | 2008年 / 75卷
关键词：
Czech Republic; European Patent Office; International Patent Classification; Patent Count; USPTO Patent;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
We have compared patenting propensity in the Czech Republic with eight EU countries: Germany, Austria, Hungary, Poland, Finland, Belgium, Ireland and Greece. In comparison based on the EPO and USPTO patents listed per million inhabitants, the Czech Republic ranks rather low. The Czech Republic also generated fewer patents per R&D employee than most other countries. The time series data have shown a decrease of number of Czech patents after 1990 with some revival after 1996. As our analysis indicated, the decrease was partially caused by dissolution or transformation of major patent generators, but the most important cause may lie in a little interest of local enterprises.
引用
收藏
页码：381 / 394
页数：13
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Brouwer E.(1999)Innovative output and firms propensity to patent. An exploration of CIS micro data Research Policy 28 615-624
  • [2] Kleinknecht A.(2005)Explaining the propensity to patent computer software Technovation 25 971-978
  • [3] Chabchoub N.(2001)Eastern European patenting activities in the USA Technovation 21 571-584
  • [4] Niosi J.(2007)Do individual factors matter? A survey of scientists patenting in Portugese public research organisations Scientometrics 70 355-377
  • [5] Marinova D.(1999)Patterns of restructuring in research, development and innovation activities in central and eastern European countries: an analysis based on S&T indicators Research Policy 28 351-376
  • [6] Moutinho P.S.F.(2006)Initiatives to promote commercialization of university knowledge Technovation 26 518-533
  • [7] Fontes M.(2002)The evolution of university patenting and licensing procedures: An empirical study of institutional change New Institutionalism in Strategic Management Advances in Strategic Management: A Research Manual 19 135-164
  • [8] Godinho M.M.(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [9] Radosevic S.(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [10] Auriol L.(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
12