Review of Process–Structure–Property Relationships in Metals Fabricated Using Binder Jet Additive Manufacturing

被引:0
作者
Nancy Huang
Olivia J. Cook
Andrea P. Argüelles
Allison M. Beese
机构
[1] Pennsylvania State University,Department of Materials Science and Engineering
[2] Pennsylvania State University,Department of Engineering Sciences and Mechanics
[3] Pennsylvania State University,Department of Mechanical Engineering
来源
Metallography, Microstructure, and Analysis | 2023年 / 12卷
关键词
Binder jet additive manufacturing; Metals; Processing; Microstructure; Mechanical behavior;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This review aims to identify process–structure–property relationships in metals fabricated using binder jet additive manufacturing. Binder jet differs from fusion-based additive manufacturing methods, such as powder bed fusion or directed energy deposition, in that the metallic component is processed without melting. The three primary stages in the binder jet process are: green body fabrication, de-binding, and post-processing, all of which have numerous variables that impact the microstructure and mechanical properties. The effects of powder characteristics, processing parameters, and post-processing conditions on porosity and mechanical properties are discussed based on data compiled from literature. Results indicate that sintering temperature and environment are more impactful for density and mechanical properties than sintering time. Binder jetting presents opportunities to rapidly fabricate components out of a wide range of materials; however, the large number of variables with intertwined impacts on structure and properties requires additional modeling and characterization efforts toward the development of optimized protocols for binder jetting. Additionally, efforts toward reliable part certification methods, particularly with nondestructive evaluation techniques, are needed for the improvement and adoption of binder jetted metals in a broader range of critical applications.
引用
收藏
页码:883 / 905
页数:22
相关论文
共 794 条
[81]  
Williams CB(2016)Infiltration of nanoparticles into porous binder jet printed parts Am. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 306 146-123
[82]  
Salim NJ(2016)Effect of solutionizing and aging on the microstructure and mechanical properties of powder bed binder jet printed nickel-based superalloy 625 Mater. Des. 123 11603-47
[83]  
Arretche I(2019)Characterization of Inconel 625 fabricated using powder-bed-based additive manufacturing technologies J. Mater. Process. Technol. 24 1-3469
[84]  
Matlack KH(2022)Microstructure–property relationship in binder jet produced and vacuum sintered 316 L Addit. Manuf. 74 953-29
[85]  
Meenashisundaram GK(2016)Brief data overview of differently heat treated binder jet printed samples made from argon atomized alloy 625 powder Data Br. 54 254-44
[86]  
Xu Z(2021)Plasticity and fracture behavior of Inconel 625 manufactured by laser powder bed fusion: comparison between as-built and stress relieved conditions Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 528 263-42
[87]  
Nai MLS(2020)Effect of scan rotation on the microstructure development and mechanical properties of 316L parts produced by laser powder bed fusion Mater. Charact. 177 385-759
[88]  
Lu S(2022)Use of ultrasound to identify microstructure–property relationships in 316 stainless steel fabricated with binder jet additive manufacturing Addit. Manuf. 156 3705-156
[89]  
Ten JS(2020)Flash sintering scaling-up challenges: influence of the sample size on the microstructure and onset temperature of the flash event Scr. Mater. 30 352-185
[90]  
Wei J(2016)Three-dimensional simulation of micrometer-sized droplet impact and penetration into the powder bed Chem. Eng. Sci. 177 138981-944