Wood specific gravity-mechanical property relationship at species level

被引:0
作者
Zhang S.Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rsrc. Assess. and Utilization Group, Forintek Canada Corp, Franquet Sainte-Foy, Que., G1P 4R4
关键词
Mechanical Property; Specific Gravity; Linear Equation; Timber; Specimen Test;
D O I
10.1007/BF00705884
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Based on the data set of specimen tests on 16 timber species belonging to four distinct wood categories, the specific gravity-mechanical property relationship at species level was examined, and differences in the relationship between species from distinct wood categories were discussed. The linear equation (S = a + bG) was compared with the curvilinear one (S = αGβ) in terms of the goodness at predicting mechanical properties through specific gravity at species level. The specific gravity-mechanical property relationship, to a differing extent, varies with mechanical properties and wood categories. Among three mechanical properties studied, MOR is most closely and almost linearly related to specific gravity, followed by Cm ax, whereas MOE is poorly and least linearly related to specific gravity. In general, the relationship between MOE and specific gravity in a species from the ring-porous category is stronger than in a species from the diffuse-porous category. It appears that Cmax in a species from the second softwood category and the ring-porous category is more closely related to specific gravity than in a species from the first softwood category and the diffuse-porous category, respectively. In addition, MOE in a softwood species is generally less related to specific gravity as compared to a hardwood species. Yet, Cmax in a softwood species appears more closely related to specific gravity. Overall, the curvilinear equation is better than the linear one at predicting mechanical properties (especially MOE) in a species.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 191
页数:10
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Armstrong J.P., Skaar C., Zeeuwde C., The effect of specific gravity on some mechanical properties of some world woods, Wood Sci. Technol., 18, pp. 137-146, (1984)
  • [2] Bendtsen B.A., Ethington R.L., Properties of major southern pines. Part II. Structural properties and specific gravity, Res. Pap. Forest Prod. Lab., 177, (1972)
  • [3] Biblis E.J., Tensile properties of loblolly pine growth zones, Wood and Fiber, 1, pp. 18-28, (1969)
  • [4] Biblis E.J., Transitional variation and relationships among properties within loblolly pine growth rings, Wood Sci. Technol., 3, pp. 14-24, (1969)
  • [5] Biblis E.J., Fitzgerald J.D., Shear properties of loblolly pine growth zones, Wood Sci., 2, pp. 193-202, (1970)
  • [6] Wood handbook: Wood as an engineering material, Agric Handb., 72, (1987)
  • [7] Kellogg R.M., Ifju G., Influence of specific gravity and certain other factors on the tensile properties of wood, Forest Prod. J., 12, pp. 463-470, (1962)
  • [8] Leclercq A., Relationships between beechwood anatomy and its physico-mechanical properties, IAWA Bull n.s. 1, 1-2, pp. 65-71, (1980)
  • [9] Liska J.A., Research progress on the relationships between density and strength, Proc. the Symposium on Density: A Key to Wood Quality, pp. 89-97, (1965)
  • [10] McAlister R.H., Modulus of elasticity distribution of loblolly pine veneer as related to location within the stem and specific gravity, Forest Prod. I, 26, 10, pp. 37-39, (1976)