Indirect comparison of etanercept, infliximab, and adalimumab for psoriatic arthritis: mixed treatment comparison using placebo as common comparator

被引:0
作者
Alberto Migliore
Emanuele Bizzi
Serena Broccoli
Bruno Laganà
机构
[1] S. Pietro Fatebenefratelli Hospital,UO of Rheumatology
[2] S.Pietro Fatebenefratelli Hospital,Research Center
[3] Bioikos Pharma,Rheumatology, 2nd Medical School
[4] s.r.l,undefined
[5] La Sapienza University,undefined
来源
Clinical Rheumatology | 2012年 / 31卷
关键词
Adalimumab; Efficacy; Etanercept; Infliximab; Psoriatic arthritis; TNFα blockers;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory joint disorder that is commonly associated with skin psoriatic lesions and can lead to severe disability. Current pharmacologic therapy for PsA includes TNFα-blocking agents for patients who are intolerant of or have an inadequate response to conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Currently, there are no published randomized controlled trials providing a head-to-head comparison of the effectiveness of the three TNFα-blocking agents used most often to treat patients with PsA (adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab). In this study, we have performed the first indirect comparison among these biologic agents, in this setting, using a mixed treatment comparison analysis of the data from pivotal trials regarding efficacy profiles of adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab evaluated as American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 response. Our results suggest that etanercept is expected to provide the greatest ACR20 response among the anti-TNFα agents compared with placebo in the treatment of patients with PsA unresponsive to conventional treatments. This analysis may be relevant for clinical decision-making, hence improving the management of PsA patients.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 137
页数:4
相关论文
共 122 条
[1]  
Jansen JP(2008)Bayesian meta-analysis of multiple treatment comparisons: an introduction to mixed treatment comparisons Value Health 11 956-964
[2]  
Crawford B(2006)Bayesian methods for evidence synthesis in cost-effectiveness analysis PharmacoEconomics 24 1-19
[3]  
Bergman G(2005)Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidence Br Med J 331 897-900
[4]  
Ades AE(2004)Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons Stat Med 23 3105-3124
[5]  
Sculpher M(2007)Using mixed treatment comparisons and meta-regression to perform indirect comparisons to estimate the efficacy of biologic treatments in rheumatoid arthritis Stat Med 26 1237-1254
[6]  
Sutton A(2010)Indirect comparison of tocilizumab and other biologic agents in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs Semin Arthritis Rheum 39 425-441
[7]  
Caldwell D(2007)Safety and efficacy of adalimumab in treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis who had failed disease modifying antirheumatic drug therapy J Rheumatol 34 1040-1050
[8]  
Ades A(2005)Sustained benefits of infliximab therapy for dermatologic and articular manifestations of psoriatic arthritis: results from the infliximab multinational psoriatic arthritis controlled trial (IMPACT) Arthritis Rheum 52 1227-1236
[9]  
Higgins J(2004)Etanercept treatment of psoriatic arthritis: safety, efficacy, and effect on disease progression Arthritis Rheum 50 2264-2272
[10]  
Lu G(2005)Adalimumab for the treatment of patients with moderately to severely active psoriatic arthritis: results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial Arthritis Rheum 52 3279-3289