How do the China Pollution Discharge Fee Policy and the Environmental Protection Tax Law affect firm performance during the transitional period?

被引:0
作者
Huan Zheng
Yu He
机构
[1] Chongqing Jiaotong University,School of Economics and Management
[2] Chongqing Technology and Business University,Research Center for Economy of Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River
来源
Environmental Science and Pollution Research | 2022年 / 29卷
关键词
Pollution Discharge Fee Policy; Environmental Protection Tax Law; Firm performance; Transitional period; Heavy polluters; State-owned enterprises;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Chinese authorities revised its Pollution Discharge Fee Policy and officially implemented the Environmental Protection Tax Law on January 1, 2018. Considering the importance of such a reform, we utilise the ordinary least squares and probit regression models to explore the effects of these policies on firm performance during the transitional period of 2016 to 2019. We find that fee rates are negatively related to firm financial performance, i.e. profitability and development capability, and positively associated with firm environmental performance, i.e. corporation social responsibility. We applied the IV 2SLS regression model to control for firms’ research and development investment, and the empirical results remain the same. Regarding subsample tests, these policies have stronger impacts on firm performance among heavy polluters and non-state-owned enterprises than those of environmental friendly firms and state-owned enterprises. The empirical results hold after we control for various potential endogeneity issues. The findings of this article may assist the authorities to adjust the tax law, so as to protect the environment and relieve the negative impact on firm performance simultaneously.
引用
收藏
页码:44541 / 44557
页数:16
相关论文
共 150 条
[1]  
Albornoz F(2009)In search of environmental spillovers World Economy 32 136-163
[2]  
Cole MA(2002)Productivity growth and environmental regulation in Mexican and US food manufacturing Am J Agr Econ 84 887-901
[3]  
Elliott RJ(1990)The impact of environmental regulations on industry productivity: direct and indirect effects J Environ Econ Manag 18 50-65
[4]  
Ercolani MG(2022)Evaluating environmental commitments to COP21 and the role of economic complexity, renewable energy, financial development, urbanization, and energy innovation: empirical evidence from the RCEP countries Renew Energy 184 541-550
[5]  
Alpay E(2021)Unveiling the heterogeneous impacts of environmental taxes on energy consumption and energy intensity: empirical evidence from OECD countries Energy 226 120366-587
[6]  
Kerkvliet J(2021)China’s quest for economic dominance and energy consumption: can Asian economies provide natural resources for the success of One Belt One Road? Manag Decis Econ 42 570-157
[7]  
Buccola S(2004)Estimating the effects of environmental regulations on firm’s competitiveness Soc Econ Stud 53 125-1982
[8]  
Barbera AJ(1998)Industrial organization and new findings on the turnover and mobility of firms J Econ Lit 36 1947-190
[9]  
McConnell VD(2018)The effect of mandatory CSR disclosure on firm profitability and social externalities: evidence from China J Account Econ 65 169-309
[10]  
Bashir MF(2013)The carbon dioxide emissions of firms: a spatial analysis J Environ Econ Manag 65 290-87