Teacher specialization and student perceived instructional quality: what are the relationships to student reading achievement?

被引:0
作者
Stefan Johansson
Eva Myrberg
机构
[1] University of Gothenburg,Department of Education and Special Education
来源
Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability | 2019年 / 31卷
关键词
Teacher education; Teacher specialization; Instructional quality; Structural equation modeling; PIRLS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
At an international level, teachers’ work is increasingly circumscribed and regulated. Notions of accountability have shifted from primarily inputs to primary outcomes, and investment in strengthening teacher performance evaluation has expanded. At the same time, investment in enhancing the quality of teacher education programs is contested in many countries. Occupational professionalism, that is, a traditional, historic form characterized by discretionary decision-making, collegial authority, and trust in the practitioner, has been replaced by organizational professionalism that incorporates target-setting and performance review. The overarching question in this study concerns the meaningfulness and appropriateness of using student perceived instructional quality for the estimation of teaching quality in comparison to teacher specialization. The study investigates relations between fourth grade students’ reading achievement levels, teacher specialization, and student perceptions of instructional quality, based on the Swedish PIRLS 2011 data. Performing two-level structural modeling with latent variables, this study revealed a positive relationship between teacher specialization relevant for the grade and subject taught, and student reading achievement. By contrast, there was no association between student perceptions of instructional quality and student reading achievement, or between instructional quality and teacher specialization. The results raise questions about the benefit of student evaluations of teacher classroom practices from both a validity perspective, as well as from a teacher professionalization perspective. However, the cross-sectional data used does not allow for causal inference, and further research on the relationships between teacher specialization, student perceived instructional quality, and student achievement is therefore needed.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 200
页数:23
相关论文
共 143 条
[1]  
Abbott A(1991)The order of professionalization. An empirical analysis Work and Occupations 18 355-384
[2]  
Ball DL(2008)Content knowledge for teaching. What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education 59 389-407
[3]  
Hoover Thames M(2007)On tests and indices for evaluating structural models Personality and Individual Differences 42 825-829
[4]  
Phelps G(2008)Teacher attrition and retention: a meta-analytic and narrative review of the research Review of Educational Research 78 367-409
[5]  
Bentler PM(2006)Education and globalization: redefining the role of the educational professional Educational Review 58 95-113
[6]  
Borman GD(2009)Teacher preparation and student achievement Eductional Evaluation and Policy Analysis 31 416-440
[7]  
Dowling NM(2013)The professional landscape: the historical development of professions in Sweden Professions and Professionalism 3 1-18
[8]  
Bottery M(2007)Teacher credentials and student achievement: longitudinal analysis with student fixed effects Economics of Education Review 26 673-682
[9]  
Boyd DJ(2010)Teachers’ education, teaching practice, and retention: a cross-genre review of recent research The Journal of Education 191 19-31
[10]  
Grossman PL(2015)Critiquing teacher preparation research: an overview of the field, part II Journal of Teacher Education 66 109-121