Application of genome editing in farm animals: cattle

被引:0
作者
Alison L. Van Eenennaam
机构
[1] University of California,
来源
Transgenic Research | 2019年 / 28卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Milk and meat from cattle and buffaloes contribute 45% of the global animal protein supply, followed by chickens (31%), and pigs (20%). In 2016, the global cattle population of 1.0 billion head produced 6.5 billion tons of cows’ milk, and 66 million tons of beef. In the past century, cattle breeding programs have greatly increased the yield per animal with a resultant decrease in the emissions intensity per unit of milk or beef, but this has not been true in all regions. Genome editing research in cattle to date has focused on disease resistance (e.g. tuberculosis), production (e.g. myostatin knockout; production of all-male offspring), elimination of allergens (e.g. beta-lactoglobulin knockout) and welfare (e.g. polled or hornlessness) traits. Modeling has revealed how the use of genome editing to introduce beneficial alleles into cattle breeds could maintain or even accelerate the rate of genetic gain accomplished by conventional breeding programs, and is a superior approach to the lengthy process of introgressing those same alleles from distant breeds. Genome editing could be used to precisely introduce useful alleles (e.g. heat tolerance, disease resistance) and haplotypes into native locally-adapted cattle breeds, thereby helping to improve their productivity. As with earlier genetic engineering approaches, whether breeders will be able to employ genome editing in cattle genetic improvement programs will very much depend upon global decisions around the regulatory framework and governance of genome editing for food animals.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 100
页数:7
相关论文
共 163 条
[1]  
Bevacqua RJ(2016)Efficient edition of the bovine PRNP prion gene in somatic cells and IVF embryos using the CRISPR/Cas9 system Theriogenology. 86 1886-1896
[2]  
Fernandez-Martín R(2018)Invited review: learning from the future-a vision for dairy farms and cows in 2067 J Dairy Sci 101 3722-3741
[3]  
Savy V(2013)The role of productivity in improving the environmental sustainability of ruminant production systems Annu Rev Anim Biosci 1 469-489
[4]  
Canel NG(2016)Regulate genome-edited products, not genome editing itself Nat Biotech 34 477-479
[5]  
Gismondi MI(2016)Production of hornless dairy cattle from genome-edited cell lines Nat Biotechnol. 34 479-81
[6]  
Kues WA(2006)Effects of calpastatin and micro-calpain markers in beef cattle on tenderness traits J Anim Sci 84 520-5
[7]  
Carlson DF(2014)Whole-genome sequencing of 234 bulls facilitates mapping of monogenic and complex traits in cattle Nat Genet 46 858-865
[8]  
Fahrenkrug SC(2014)The SLICK hair locus derived from Senepol cattle confers thermotolerance to intensively managed lactating Holstein cows J Dairy Sci 9 5508-5520
[9]  
Niemann H(2017)Single Cas9 nickase induced generation of NRAMP1 knockin cattle with reduced off-target effects Genome Biol 18 13-14
[10]  
Taboga OA(2016)Generation of exogenous germ cells in the ovaries of sterile NANOS3-null beef cattle Sci Rep. 27 24983-256