“Many miles to go …”: a systematic review of the implementation of patient decision support interventions into routine clinical practice

被引:0
作者
Glyn Elwyn
Isabelle Scholl
Caroline Tietbohl
Mala Mann
Adrian GK Edwards
Catharine Clay
France Légaré
Trudy van der Weijden
Carmen L Lewis
Richard M Wexler
Dominick L Frosch
机构
[1] Cardiff University School of Medicine,Cochrane Institute of Primary Care and Public Health
[2] University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,Department of Medical Psychology
[3] Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute,Department of Health Services Research
[4] The Dartmouth Institute of Health Policy and Clinical Practice,Office of Professional Education and Outreach
[5] Research Centre of Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec,Knowledge Transfer and Health Technology Assessment Research Group
[6] Hôpital Saint-François D'Assise,Department of General Practice
[7] School CAPHRI,undefined
[8] University of North Carolina,undefined
[9] Informed Medical Decisions Foundation,undefined
来源
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | / 13卷
关键词
Decision Support; Organizational Commitment; Shared Decision Making; Routine Clinical Setting; Decision Support Intervention;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 370 条
  • [1] Gravel K(2006)Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions Implement Sci 1 16-253
  • [2] Légaré F(2010)Implementing shared decision making in the NHS BMJ 341 c5146-33
  • [3] Graham I(2011)Moving SDM forward in Canada: milestones, public involvement, and barriers that remain Z Evid Fortbild Qual 105 245-97
  • [4] Elwyn G(2011)Policy and practice developments in the implementation of shared decision making: an international perspective Z Evid Fortbild Qual 105 229-23
  • [5] Coulter A(2012)Incorporating patient decision aids into standard clinical practice in an integrated delivery system Med Decis Making 33 85-311
  • [6] Laitner S(2008)Arduous implementation: does the Normalisation Process Model explain why it’s so difficult to embed decision support technologies for patients in routine clinical practice Implement Sci 3 57-1080
  • [7] Walker E(2006)Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process BMJ 333 417-11
  • [8] Watson P(2009)Assessing the quality of decision support technologies using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument (IPDASi) PLoS One 4 e4705-60
  • [9] Thomson R(2011)Time to take health delivery research seriously J Am Med Assoc 306 310-138
  • [10] Légaré F(1996)The challenge of innovation implementation Acad Manage Rev 21 1055-642