Interactive multiobjective optimization with NIMBUS for decision making under uncertainty

被引:0
作者
Kaisa Miettinen
Jyri Mustajoki
Theodor J. Stewart
机构
[1] University of Jyväskylä,Department of Mathematical Information Technology
[2] Tampere University of Technology,Department of Automation Science and Engineering
[3] Finnish Environmental Institute,Department of Statistical Sciences
[4] Freshwater Centre,undefined
[5] University of Cape Town,undefined
来源
OR Spectrum | 2014年 / 36卷
关键词
Multiple objective programming; Interactive methods ; Scenarios; Uncertainty handling; Pareto optimality; Classification of objectives;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We propose an interactive method for decision making under uncertainty, where uncertainty is related to the lack of understanding about consequences of actions. Such situations are typical, for example, in design problems, where a decision maker has to make a decision about a design at a certain moment of time even though the actual consequences of this decision can be possibly seen only many years later. To overcome the difficulty of predicting future events when no probabilities of events are available, our method utilizes groupings of objectives or scenarios to capture different types of future events. Each scenario is modeled as a multiobjective optimization problem to represent different and conflicting objectives associated with the scenarios. We utilize the interactive classification-based multiobjective optimization method NIMBUS for assessing the relative optimality of the current solution in different scenarios. This information can be utilized when considering the next step of the overall solution process. Decision making is performed by giving special attention to individual scenarios. We demonstrate our method with an example in portfolio optimization.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 56
页数:17
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
Bennett EM(2003)Why global scenarios need ecology Front Ecol Environ 1 322-329
[2]  
Carpenter SR(2010)Towards an estimation of nadir objective vector using a hybrid of evolutionary and local search approaches IEEE Trans Evol Comput 14 821-841
[3]  
Peterson GD(2007)Scenario analysis in environmental impact assessment: improving explorations of the future Environ Impact Assess Rev 27 206-219
[4]  
Cumming GS(2003)Integrating scenario planning and goal programming J Multi Criteria Decis Anal 12 261-271
[5]  
Zurek M(2004)An MCDM approach to portfolio optimization Eur J Oper Res 155 752-770
[6]  
Pingali P(2007)2D decision-making for multicriteria design optimization Struct Multidiscip Optim 34 301-315
[7]  
Deb K(2008)Interactive coordination of objective decompositions in multiobjective programming Manag Sci 54 1350-1363
[8]  
Miettinen K(2001)Enhancing strategy evaluation in scenario planning: a role for decision analysis J Manag Stud 38 1-16
[9]  
Chaudhuri S(2004)The multiscenario lot size problem with concave costs Eur J Oper Res 156 168-182
[10]  
Duinker PN(2011)Wastewater treatment: new insight provided by interactive multiobjective optimization Decis Support Syst 51 328-337