Proprioceptive comparison of allograft and autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions

被引:0
|
作者
A. Merter Ozenci
Erkan Inanmaz
Haluk Ozcanli
Yetkin Soyuncu
Nehir Samanci
Tufan Dagseven
Nilüfer Balci
Semih Gur
机构
[1] Akdeniz University School of Medicine,Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
[2] Akdeniz University School of Medicine,Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation
来源
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | 2007年 / 15卷
关键词
Allograft; Proprioception; Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL); Knee; Reconstruction;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study is to search if there is any proprioceptive difference between auto and allograft anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions, and also to determine if there is any relationship between instrumented anterior knee laxity and proprioception after an ACL reconstruction. The following four groups were constituted for this purpose: group I, control group; group II, autograft reconstructions; group III, allograft reconstructions and group IV, people with injured ACLs. Each group consisted of 20 patients/volunteers. Two subgroups were constituted according to the findings of KT-1000 laxity testing in group II and III; patients/volunteers found to have a laxity of 3 mm or less were enroled in the normal subgroup and those with a laxity of more than 3 mm were enroled in the lax subgroup. Two proprioceptive tests were used: threshold to detect passive motion (TDPM) and joint position sense (JPS) by using Cybex Norm dynamometer. Patients underwent ten tests and the discrepancy in degrees was averaged for ten trials. Comparisons were made to evaluate the proprioceptive differences between groups/subgroups; ANOVA and t test was used for comparisons where appropriate, and the significance was set at P < 0.05. There was a significant difference in degrees between patients with injured ACLs and the other three groups in TDPM evaluations (injured: 1.93° vs. control: 1.03°, autograft: 1.01°, allograft: 0.96°; P < 0.001). Auto and allograft reconstructions were not different from each other and controls. Allo and autograft ACL reconstructions are not different from each other according to proprioceptive measurements. Also, proprioception is not correlated to postoperative anterior knee laxity; many variables involve joint proprioception and mostly the anterior knee laxity may not be the sole determining element, and a lax ACL still may fulfill some of its afferent arc functions as long as it bridges the femur and tibia.
引用
收藏
页码:1432 / 1437
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A COMPARISON OF PATELLAR TENDON AUTOGRAFT AND ALLOGRAFT USED FOR ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION IN THE GOAT MODEL
    JACKSON, DW
    GROOD, ES
    GOLDSTEIN, JD
    ROSEN, MA
    KURZWEIL, PR
    CUMMINGS, JF
    SIMON, TM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1993, 21 (02): : 176 - 185
  • [22] Clinical outcomes of allograft versus autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Baer, Geoffrey S.
    Harner, Christopher D.
    CLINICS IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (04) : 661 - +
  • [23] Autograft or allograft for reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament: a health economics perspective
    Mistry, Hema
    Metcalfe, Andrew
    Colquitt, Jill
    Loveman, Emma
    Smith, Nick A.
    Royle, Pamela
    Waugh, Norman
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2019, 27 (06) : 1782 - 1790
  • [24] Comparative study of autograft or allograft in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    T. Kustos
    L. Bálint
    P. Than
    Tamás Bárdos
    International Orthopaedics, 2004, 28 : 290 - 293
  • [25] Survival Comparison of Allograft and Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction at the United States Military Academy
    Pallis, Mark
    Svoboda, Steven J.
    Cameron, Kenneth L.
    Owens, Brett D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2012, 40 (06): : 1242 - 1246
  • [26] Autograft or Allograft? Irradiated or Not? A Contrast Between Autograft and Allograft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis
    Wang, ShuaiYi
    Zhang, Chi
    Cai, YouZhi
    Lin, XiangJin
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2018, 34 (12): : 3258 - 3265
  • [27] Comparison of medium-term revision rates after autograft and allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Sevimli, Resit
    Gormeli, Gokay
    Polat, Haci
    Kilinc, Oner
    Turkmen, Ersen
    Aslanturk, Okan
    ANNALI ITALIANI DI CHIRURGIA, 2020, 91 (04) : 410 - 416
  • [28] Histological comparison of fate of ligamentous insertion after reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament: autograft vs allograft
    张春礼
    范宏斌
    徐虎
    李起鸿
    郭林
    中华创伤杂志(英文版), 2006, (02) : 72 - 76
  • [29] A Retrospective Comparison of the Incidence of Bacterial Infection Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Autograft Versus Allograft
    Katz, Laurie M.
    Battaglia, Todd C.
    Patino, Paul
    Reichmann, William
    Hunter, David J.
    Richmond, John C.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2008, 24 (12): : 1330 - 1335
  • [30] Histological comparison of fate of ligamentous insertion after reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament: autograft vs allograft
    张春礼
    范宏斌
    徐虎
    李起鸿
    郭林
    ChineseJournalofTraumatology, 2006, (02) : 72 - 76