Clinical classification of scoliosis patients using machine learning and markerless 3D surface trunk data

被引:0
作者
Stephan Rothstock
Hans-Rudolf Weiss
Daniel Krueger
Lothar Paul
机构
[1] GFaI Gesellschaft zur Förderung angewandter Informatik e. V.,Society for the Advancement of Applied Computer Science Berlin
[2] KOOB ScoliTechGmbH & Co KG,undefined
来源
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing | 2020年 / 58卷
关键词
Scoliosis; 3D surface scan; Asymmetry distance map; Machine learning; Classification;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Markerless 3D surface topography for scoliosis diagnosis and brace treatment can avoid repeated radiation known from standard X-ray analysis and possible side effects. Combined with the method of torso asymmetry analysis, curve severity and progression can be evaluated with high reliability. In the current study, a machine learning approach was utilised to classify scoliosis patients based on their trunk surface asymmetry pattern. Frontal X-ray and 3D scanning analysis with a clinical classification based on Cobb angle and spinal curve pattern were performed with 50 patients. Similar as in a previous study, each patient’s trunk 3D reconstruction was used for an elastic registration of a reference surface mesh with fixed number of vertices. Subsequently, an asymmetry distance map between original and reflected torso was calculated. A fully connected neural network was then utilised to classify patients regarding their Cobb angle (mild, moderate, severe) and an Augmented Lehnert-Schroth (ALS) classification based on their full torso asymmetry distance map. The results reveal a classification success rate of 90% (SE: 80%, SP: 100%) regarding the curve severity (mild vs moderate-severe) and 50–72% regarding the ALS group. Identifying patient curve severity and treatment group was reasonably possible allowing for a decision support during diagnosis and treatment planning.
引用
收藏
页码:2953 / 2962
页数:9
相关论文
共 152 条
[1]  
Bryan R(2010)Statistical modelling of the whole human femur incorporating geometric and material properties Med Eng Phys 32 57-65
[2]  
Mohan PS(1948)Outline for the study of scoliosis, instructional course lectures Am Acad Orthop Surg 5 261-275
[3]  
Hopkins A(2000)Breast cancer mortality after diagnostic radiography: findings from the U.S. scoliosis cohort study Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25 2052-2063
[4]  
Cobb RJ(1978)(Application of Moiré topography to diagnosis and documentation of anomalies of the trunk (author’s transl)) Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 116 789-784
[5]  
Doody MM(1984)Principles of measurement of vertebral rotation from frontal projections of the pedicles J Biomech 17 923-935
[6]  
Lonstein JE(1985)Improvements in measuring vertebral rotation from the projections of the pedicles J Biomech 18 369-378
[7]  
Stovall M(2014)Rasterstereographic measurement of scoliotic deformity Scoliosis. 9 22-1362
[8]  
Hacker DG(1992)Evaluation of frontal radiographs of scoliotic spines--part I. measurement of position and orientation of vertebrae and assessment of clinical shape parameters J Biomech 25 1357-1450
[9]  
Luckyanov N(1992)Evaluation of frontal radiographs of scoliotic spines--part II. Relations between lateral deviation, lateral tilt and axial rotation of vertebrae J Biomech 25 1443-36
[10]  
Land CE(1994)Back shape measurement using video rasterstereography and three-dimensional reconstruction of spinal shape Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 9 28-383