Complications of Temporary Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock: An Appraisal of Contemporary Literature

被引:0
作者
Anna V. Subramaniam
Gregory W. Barsness
Saarwaani Vallabhajosyula
Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula
机构
[1] Mayo Clinic,Department of Medicine
[2] Mayo Clinic,Department of Cardiovascular Medicine
[3] Mayo Clinic,Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine
来源
Cardiology and Therapy | 2019年 / 8卷
关键词
Cardiogenic shock; Complications; Impella; Intra-aortic balloon pump; Mechanical circulatory support; TandemHeart; Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is associated with hemodynamic compromise and end-organ hypoperfusion due to a primary cardiac etiology. In addition to vasoactive medications, percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices offer the ability to support the hemodynamics and prevent acute organ failure. Despite the wide array of available MCS devices for CS, there are limited data on the complications from these devices. In this review, we seek to summarize the complications of MCS devices in the contemporary era. Using a systems-based approach, this review covers domains of hematological, neurological, vascular, infectious, mechanical, and miscellaneous complications. These data are intended to provide a balanced narrative and aid in risk–benefit decision-making in this acutely ill population.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 228
页数:17
相关论文
共 505 条
[31]  
Prasad A(2003)Contemporary utilization and outcomes of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction: the Benchmark Registry J Am Coll Cardiol 41 1940-96
[32]  
Sakhuja A(2006)Outcome evaluation of the bridge-to-bridge concept in patients with cardiogenic shock Ann Thorac Surg 82 28-696
[33]  
Vallabhajosyula S(2010)Clinical implications of thrombocytopenia among patients undergoing intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation in the coronary care unit Clin Cardiol 33 30-1900
[34]  
Dunlay SM(2011)Clinical experience and patient outcomes associated with the TandemHeart percutaneous transseptal assist device among a heterogeneous patient population ASAIO J 57 254-983
[35]  
Murphree DH(2015)Complications of intra-aortic balloon pump use: does the final position of the IABP tip matter? Anaesth Intensive Care 43 66-1480
[36]  
Vallabhajosyula S(2019)Adult cardiac veno-arterial extracorporeal life support (VA-ECMO): prevention and management of acute complications Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 8 66-1458
[37]  
Kashani K(2015)A 6-year single-center experience of intra-aortic balloon pump treatment-retrospective analysis of 223 patients J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 29 1410-104
[38]  
Dunlay SM(2000)Sex and other predictors of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation-related complications: prospective study of 1119 consecutive patients Am Heart J 139 282-3531
[39]  
Vallabhajosyula S(2005)Randomized comparison of intra-aortic balloon support with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock Eur Heart J 26 1276-715
[40]  
Prasad A(2009)A prospective feasibility trial investigating the use of the Impella 25 system in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (The PROTECT I Trial): initial U.S. experience JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2 91-874