Complications of Temporary Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock: An Appraisal of Contemporary Literature

被引:0
作者
Anna V. Subramaniam
Gregory W. Barsness
Saarwaani Vallabhajosyula
Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula
机构
[1] Mayo Clinic,Department of Medicine
[2] Mayo Clinic,Department of Cardiovascular Medicine
[3] Mayo Clinic,Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine
来源
Cardiology and Therapy | 2019年 / 8卷
关键词
Cardiogenic shock; Complications; Impella; Intra-aortic balloon pump; Mechanical circulatory support; TandemHeart; Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is associated with hemodynamic compromise and end-organ hypoperfusion due to a primary cardiac etiology. In addition to vasoactive medications, percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices offer the ability to support the hemodynamics and prevent acute organ failure. Despite the wide array of available MCS devices for CS, there are limited data on the complications from these devices. In this review, we seek to summarize the complications of MCS devices in the contemporary era. Using a systems-based approach, this review covers domains of hematological, neurological, vascular, infectious, mechanical, and miscellaneous complications. These data are intended to provide a balanced narrative and aid in risk–benefit decision-making in this acutely ill population.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 228
页数:17
相关论文
共 505 条
[1]  
van Diepen S(2017)Contemporary management of cardiogenic shock: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Circulation 136 e232-e268
[2]  
Katz JN(2019)Multidisciplinary teams for cardiogenic shock Aging (Albany NY). 11 4774-4776
[3]  
Albert NM(2019)Acute noncardiac organ failure in acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock J Am Coll Cardiol 73 1781-1791
[4]  
Vallabhajosyula S(2019)Utilization of palliative care for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: a 15-year national perspective on trends, disparities, predictors, and outcomes J Am Heart Assoc. 8 e011954-497
[5]  
Barsness GW(2019)Temporal trends, predictors, and outcomes of acute kidney injury and hemodialysis use in acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock PLoS One 14 e0222894-476
[6]  
Vallabhajosyula S(2018)Development and performance of a novel vasopressor-driven mortality prediction model in septic shock Ann Intensive Care. 8 112-426
[7]  
Vallabhajosyula S(2018)Concomitant intra-aortic balloon pump use in cardiogenic shock requiring veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 11 e006930-200
[8]  
Dunlay SM(2018)Temporary mechanical circulatory support for refractory cardiogenic shock before left ventricular assist device surgery J Am Heart Assoc. 7 e010193-e26
[9]  
Prasad A(2019)Trends, predictors, and outcomes of temporary mechanical circulatory support for postcardiac surgery cardiogenic shock Am J Cardiol 123 489-597
[10]  
Vallabhajosyula S(2018)Tako-tsubo cardiomyopathy in severe sepsis: nationwide trends, predictors, and outcomes J Am Heart Assoc. 7 e009160-346