Socioeconomic status and health: education and income are independent and joint predictors of ambulatory blood pressure

被引:0
作者
Jenny M. Cundiff
Bert N. Uchino
Timothy W. Smith
Wendy Birmingham
机构
[1] University of Utah,Department of Psychology
来源
Journal of Behavioral Medicine | 2015年 / 38卷
关键词
Income; Education; Gender effects; Socioeconomic status; Ambulatory blood pressure; Health;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Epidemiological research suggests that different indicators of socioeconomic status (SES) such as income and education may have independent and/or interactive effects on health outcomes. In this study, we examined both simple and more complex associations (i.e., interactions) between different indicators of SES and ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) during daily life. Our sample consisted of 94 married couples who completed a one-day ABP protocol. Both income and education were independently related to systolic blood pressure and only income was significantly related to diastolic blood pressure. There were also statistical interactions such that individuals with high levels of both income and education evidenced the lowest ABP. Gender moderated these findings. Three-way interactions revealed that, in general, women appear to benefit from either indicator of SES, whereas men appear to benefit more from income. The findings are consistent with epidemiological research and suggest one important physiological mechanism by which income and education may have independent and interactive effects on health.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 16
页数:7
相关论文
共 139 条
  • [1] Adler NE(2009)Health disparities through a psychological lens American Psychologist 64 663-673
  • [2] Adler NE(1994)Socioeconomic status and health: The challenge of the gradient American Psychologist 49 15-24
  • [3] Chesney MA(1999)Socioeconomic status and health: What we know and what we don’t Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 896 3-15
  • [4] Cohen S(1995)Toward understanding the association of socioeconomic status and health: A new challenge for the biopsychosocial approach Psychosomatic Medicine 57 213-225
  • [5] Folkman S(2005)Socioeconomic status in health research: One size does not fit all JAMA Journal of the American Medical Association 294 2879-2888
  • [6] Boyce T(2002)Estimating actor, partner, and interaction effects for dyadic data using PROC MIXED and HLM: A user-friendly guide Personal Relationships 9 327-342
  • [7] Kahn RL(2008)Noninvasive 24-h ambulatory blood pressure and cardiovascular disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis Journal of Hypertension 26 1290-1299
  • [8] Adler NE(1998)Education and occupational social class: Which is the more important indicator of mortality risk? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 52 153-160
  • [9] Ostrove JM(1996)Educational differentials in mortality: United States, 1979–1985 Social Science and Medicine 42 47-57
  • [10] Anderson NB(1994)General class of covariance structures for two or more repeated factors in longitudinal data analysis Communications in Statistics Theory and Methods 23 3105-3119