Serum amyloid A as a marker of disease activity and treatment response in Takayasu arteritis

被引:0
作者
Aswin M. Nair
Ruchika Goel
M. Hindhumati
K. Jayakanthan
J. Visalakshi
George Joseph
Sumita Danda
Debashish Danda
机构
[1] Christian Medical College,Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology
[2] Christian Medical College,Department of Biostatistics
[3] Christian Medical College,Department of Cardiology
[4] Christian Medical College,Department of Clinical Genetics
来源
Rheumatology International | 2017年 / 37卷
关键词
Takayasu arteritis; Vasculitis; Serum amyloid A; Biomarker; Gene polymorphism;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Assessment of disease activity in Takayasu arteritis (TA) is challenging. We aimed to study utility of serum amyloid A (SAA) to assess disease activity and its association with SAA gene polymorphisms, if any, in our TA patients. Serum of 99 consecutive adult TA patients and 40 healthy controls were assayed for SAA. Depending on the ITAS2010 and ITAS-CRP score, patients were designated as having active disease if ITAS2010 ≥ 2 or ITAS-CRP ≥ 3 and stable disease if ITAS2010 = 0 or ITAS-CRP is ≤1. Clinical ITAS of 0 with raised inflammatory markers scoring a ITAS-CRP of 2 was considered as indeterminate for disease activity assessment. Repeat SAA levels for active group was measured after 6 months from baseline. SAA levels between active and stable disease as well as serial levels were compared. DNA of 40 patients and controls were genotyped for SAA polymorphisms (rs12218, rs2468844) and the allele frequencies were compared. At baseline, SAA levels were higher in patients as compared to controls (137.4 vs 100.8 ng/ml, p = 0.001) and higher in patients with active disease (166.4 ng/ml) than those with stable disease (98.2 ng/ml), p = 0.001. SAA decreased during follow-up in treatment responders (189.9 ng/ml at baseline vs 119.0 ng/ml at follow-up, p = 0.008); in contrast, there was no significant change among non-responders during follow-up. Allelic frequencies of SAA gene polymorphisms did not differ between cases and controls. SAA may be a reliable biomarker to assess disease activity and treatment response in TA.
引用
收藏
页码:1643 / 1649
页数:6
相关论文
共 85 条
  • [1] Kerr GS(1994)Takayasu arteritis Ann Intern Med 120 919-929
  • [2] Hallahan CW(2011)Assessment of disease activity and progression in Takayasu’s arteritis Clin Exp Rheumatol 29 S86-S91
  • [3] Giordano J(2013)Disease assessment in Takayasu’s arteritis Rheumatology 16 4-483
  • [4] Leavitt RY(2013)Diagnosis and assessment of Takayasu arteritis by multiple biomarkers Circ J 77 477-S28
  • [5] Fauci AS(2014)Role of inflammatory markers in Takayasu arteritis disease monitoring BMC Neurol 28 62-1473
  • [6] Rottem M(2003)Laboratory investigations useful in giant cell arteritis and Takayasu’s arteritis Clin Exp Rheumatol 21 S23-69
  • [7] Direskeneli H(2003)Matrix metalloproteinases as novel disease markers in Takayasu arteritis Circulation 108 1469-706
  • [8] Aydin SZ(2000)Expression and function of serum amyloid A, a major acute-phase protein, in normal and disease states Curr Opin Hematol 7 64-2456
  • [9] Merkel PA(2010)Circulation levels of acute phase proteins in patients with Takayasu arteritis J Vasc Surg 51 700-1167
  • [10] Direskeneli H(2015)Regulation of inflammation and angiogenesis in giant cell arteritis by acute-phase serum amyloid A Arthritis Rheumatol Hoboken NJ 67 2447-780