Contingency awareness as a prerequisite for differential contextual fear conditioning

被引:0
作者
Christian Baeuchl
Michael Hoppstädter
Patric Meyer
Herta Flor
机构
[1] Heidelberg University,Department of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim
[2] Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Heidelberg/Mannheim,undefined
来源
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience | 2019年 / 19卷
关键词
Contextual fear conditioning; Contingency awareness; fMRI; Hippocampus; Neuropsychological testing; Functional connectivity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Contingency awareness during conditioning describes the phenomenon of becoming consciously aware of the association between a conditioned stimulus (CS) and an unconditioned stimulus (US). Despite the fact that contingency awareness is necessary for associative learning in some conditioning paradigms, its role in contextual fear conditioning, a variant that uses a context-CS (CTX) instead of a cue, has not been characterized thus far. We investigated if contingency awareness is a prerequisite for contextual fear conditioning and if subjects classified as aware differ from unaware subjects on a hemodynamic, autonomic, and behavioral level. We used a computer-generated picture context as CTX and slightly painful electric stimulation as US while we recorded brain responses by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and obtained skin conductance responses (SCR) and verbal ratings of emotional valence and arousal. SCR analyses revealed that only aware subjects became conditioned to the US-associated CTX (CTX+). Brain activity related to the CTX+ was more strongly pronounced in fear-associated areas like the insula in the aware relative to the unaware group. Finally, the hippocampus was functionally connected to the cingulate cortex and posterior medial frontal gyrus in aware subjects relative to unaware subjects. These task-related differential connectivity patterns suggest that information exchange between the hippocampus and regions involved in the expression of conditioned fear and decision uncertainty is crucial for the acquisition of contingency knowledge. This study demonstrates the importance of contingency awareness for contextual fear conditioning and points to the hippocampus as a potential mediator for contingency learning in contextual learning.
引用
收藏
页码:811 / 828
页数:17
相关论文
共 301 条
  • [1] Alvarez RP(2008)Contextual fear conditioning in humans: cortical-hippocampal and amygdala contributions J Neurosci 28 6211-6219
  • [2] Biggs A(2015)Initial and sustained brain responses to contextual conditioned anxiety in humans Cortex 63 352-363
  • [3] Chen G(2015)Contextual fear conditioning in humans using feature-identical contexts Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 121 1-11
  • [4] Pine DS(1995)Double dissociation of conditioning and declarative knowledge relative to the amygdala and hippocampus in humans Science 269 1115-1118
  • [5] Grillon C(2010)A continuous measure of phasic electrodermal activity J Neurosci Methods 190 80-91
  • [6] Andreatta M(1995)Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological). 57 289-300
  • [7] Glotzbach-Schoon E(2000)Classical fear conditioning in functional neuroimaging Curr Opin Neurobiol 10 219-223
  • [8] Muhlberger A(1999)Amygdala-hippocampal involvement in human aversive trace conditioning revealed through event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging J Neurosci 19 10869-10876
  • [9] Schulz SM(1998)Brain systems mediating aversive conditioning: an event-related fMRI study Neuron 20 947-957
  • [10] Wiemer J(2004)Randomness and inductions from streaks: "gambler's fallacy" versus "hot hand" Psychon Bull Rev 11 179-184