A Cross-Sectional Survey Study to Assess Prevalence and Attitudes Regarding Research Misconduct among Investigators in the Middle East

被引:22
作者
Felaefel M. [1 ]
Salem M. [1 ]
Jaafar R. [2 ]
Jassim G. [3 ]
Edwards H. [4 ]
Rashid-Doubell F. [3 ]
Yousri R. [5 ]
Ali N.M. [6 ]
Silverman H. [4 ]
机构
[1] American University in Cairo, New Cairo
[2] American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut
[3] Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland - Medical University of Bahrain, Busaiteen
[4] University of Maryland School of Medicine, 110 S. Paca St, Baltimore, 21201, MD
[5] Cairo University, Cairo
[6] Suez Canal University, Ismailia
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Middle East; Research ethics; Research misconduct; Responsible conduct in research;
D O I
10.1007/s10805-017-9295-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Recent studies from Western countries indicate significant levels of questionable research practices, but similar data from low and middle-income countries are limited. Our aims were to assess the prevalence of and attitudes regarding research misconduct among researchers in several universities in the Middle East and to identify factors that might account for our findings. We distributed an anonymous questionnaire to a convenience sample of investigators at several universities in Egypt, Lebanon, and Bahrain. Participants were asked to a) self-report their extent of research misconducts, as well as their knowledge of colleagues engaging in similar research misconducts and b) provide their extent of agreement with certain attitudes about research misconduct. We used descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate logistic regression statistics to analyze the data. Data from 278 participants showed a high prevalence of misconduct, as 59.4% of our respondents self-reported to committing at least one misbehaviors and 74.5% reported having knowledge of any misbehaviors among any of their colleagues. The most common type of self-report misconduct was “circumventing research ethics regulations” (50.5%) followed by “fabrication and falsification” (28.6%). A significant predictor of misconduct included a lack of “prior ethics training”. Scientific misconduct represents a significant issue in several universities in the Middle East. The demonstration that a lack of “prior ethics training” was a significant predictor of misconduct should lead to educational initiatives in research integrity. Further studies are needed to confirm whether our results can be generalized to other universities in the Middle East. © 2017, Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 87
页数:16
相关论文
共 27 条
[11]  
Dhingra D., Mishra D., Publication misconduct among medical professionals in India, Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 11, 2, pp. 104-107, (2014)
[12]  
Eastwood S., Derish P., Leash E., Et al., Ethical issues in biomedical research: perceptions and practices of postdoctoral research fellow responding to a survey, Science Eng Ethics, 2, pp. 89-114, (1996)
[13]  
Fanelli D., How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data, PLoSOne, 4, pp. 1-11, (2009)
[14]  
Geggie D., A survey of newly appointed consultants' attitudes towards research fraud, Journal of Medical Ethics, 27, 5, pp. 344-346, (2001)
[15]  
Heitman E., Litewka S., International perspectives on plagiarism and considerations for teaching international trainees, Urologic Oncology, 29, 1, pp. 104-108, (2011)
[16]  
Kalichman M.W., Freidman P.J., A pilot study of bomedical trainees' perceptions concerning research ethics, Academic Medicine, 67, pp. 769-775, (1992)
[17]  
Martinson B.C., Anderson M.S., de Vries R., Scientists behaving badly, Nature, 435, pp. 737-748, (2005)
[18]  
Martinson B.C., Anderson M.S., Crain A.L., de Vries R., Scientists' perceptions of organizational justice and self-reported misbehaviors, Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 1, 1, pp. 51-66, (2006)
[19]  
Merton R.K., Social structure and anomie, American Sociological Review, 3, pp. 672-682, (1938)
[20]  
Mundt L.A., Perceptions of scientific misconduct among graduate allied health students relative to ethics education and gender, Journal of Allied Health, 37, 4, pp. 221-224, (2008)