Early response of patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: a comparison of PET/CT and MRI

[1] Hricak H(2007)Early invasive cervical cancer: CT and MR imaging in preoperative evaluation—ACRIN/GOG comparative study of diagnostic performance and interobserver variability Radiology 245 491-498

[2] Gatsonis C(2009)18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography and pathologic tumor size in early-stage invasive cervical cancer Int J Gynecol Cancer 19 1412-1414

[3] Coakley FV(2007)The role of FDG-PET/CT imaging after radiation therapy Gynecol Oncol 107 S27-S29

[4] Snyder B(2007)Association of posttherapy positron emission tomography with tumor response and survival in cervical carcinoma JAMA 298 2289-2295

[5] Reinhold C(2006)FDG-PET imaging for the assessment of physiologic volume response during radiotherapy in cervix cancer Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 65 177-181

[6] Schwartz LH(2007)The prognostic significance of tumor volume regression during radiotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer using MRI Gynecol Oncol 107 320-325

[7] Showalter TN(2011)Tumor volume discrepancies between FDG-PET and MRI for cervical cancer Radiother Oncol 98 139-142

[8] Miller TR(2000)New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada J Natl Cancer Inst 92 205-216

[9] Huettner P(1982)Radiation-induced tumor regression as a prognostic factor in patients with invasive cervical cancer Cancer 49 35-39

[10] Rader J(1992)Prognostic assessment of tumor regression after external irradiation for cervical cancer Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 22 913-917

[1] Hricak H(2007)Early invasive cervical cancer: CT and MR imaging in preoperative evaluation—ACRIN/GOG comparative study of diagnostic performance and interobserver variability Radiology 245 491-498

[2] Gatsonis C(2009)18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography and pathologic tumor size in early-stage invasive cervical cancer Int J Gynecol Cancer 19 1412-1414

[3] Coakley FV(2007)The role of FDG-PET/CT imaging after radiation therapy Gynecol Oncol 107 S27-S29

[4] Snyder B(2007)Association of posttherapy positron emission tomography with tumor response and survival in cervical carcinoma JAMA 298 2289-2295

[5] Reinhold C(2006)FDG-PET imaging for the assessment of physiologic volume response during radiotherapy in cervix cancer Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 65 177-181

[6] Schwartz LH(2007)The prognostic significance of tumor volume regression during radiotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer using MRI Gynecol Oncol 107 320-325

[7] Showalter TN(2011)Tumor volume discrepancies between FDG-PET and MRI for cervical cancer Radiother Oncol 98 139-142

[8] Miller TR(2000)New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada J Natl Cancer Inst 92 205-216

[9] Huettner P(1982)Radiation-induced tumor regression as a prognostic factor in patients with invasive cervical cancer Cancer 49 35-39

[10] Rader J(1992)Prognostic assessment of tumor regression after external irradiation for cervical cancer Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 22 913-917