Brazilian version of the King’s Health Questionnaire: assessment of the structural validity and internal consistency in female urinary incontinence

[1] Ebbesen MH(2013)Prevalence, incidence and remission of urinary incontinence in women: longitudinal data from the Norwegian HUNT study (EPINCONT) BMC Urol 13 27-1379

[2] Hunskaar S(1997)A new questionnaire to assess the quality of life of urinary incontinent women Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104 1374-1303

[3] Rortveit G(2021)A systematic review of utility-based and disease-specific quality of life measurement instruments for women with urinary incontinence Neurourol Urodyn 40 1275-562

[4] Hannestad YS(2019)Characterizing the health-related quality of life burden of overactive bladder using disease-specific patient-reported outcome measures: a systematic literature review Adv Ther 36 548-1135

[5] Kelleher C(2014)Quality assurance in quality of life assessment—measuring the validity of the King’s Health Questionnaire Int Urogynecol J 25 1133-175

[6] Cardozo L(2014)Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis Lancet 383 166-211

[7] Khullar V(2003)Validation of the Portuguese version of the King’s Health Questionnaire for urinary incontinent women Rev Saude Publica 37 203-242

[8] Salvatore S(2005)Validação do questionário de qualidade de vida (King’s Health Questionnaire) em mulheres brasileiras com incontinência urinária Rev Bras Ginecol Obs 27 235-1859

[9] Wuytack F(2015)Reliability and validity of the Turkish King’s Health Questionnaire in women with urinary incontinence Int Urogynecol J 26 1853-1033

[10] Moran P(2015)Adaptation and validation of the King’s Health Questionnaire in Portuguese women with urinary incontinence Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 26 1027-855

[1] Ebbesen MH(2013)Prevalence, incidence and remission of urinary incontinence in women: longitudinal data from the Norwegian HUNT study (EPINCONT) BMC Urol 13 27-1379

[2] Hunskaar S(1997)A new questionnaire to assess the quality of life of urinary incontinent women Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104 1374-1303

[3] Rortveit G(2021)A systematic review of utility-based and disease-specific quality of life measurement instruments for women with urinary incontinence Neurourol Urodyn 40 1275-562

[4] Hannestad YS(2019)Characterizing the health-related quality of life burden of overactive bladder using disease-specific patient-reported outcome measures: a systematic literature review Adv Ther 36 548-1135

[5] Kelleher C(2014)Quality assurance in quality of life assessment—measuring the validity of the King’s Health Questionnaire Int Urogynecol J 25 1133-175

[6] Cardozo L(2014)Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis Lancet 383 166-211

[7] Khullar V(2003)Validation of the Portuguese version of the King’s Health Questionnaire for urinary incontinent women Rev Saude Publica 37 203-242

[8] Salvatore S(2005)Validação do questionário de qualidade de vida (King’s Health Questionnaire) em mulheres brasileiras com incontinência urinária Rev Bras Ginecol Obs 27 235-1859

[9] Wuytack F(2015)Reliability and validity of the Turkish King’s Health Questionnaire in women with urinary incontinence Int Urogynecol J 26 1853-1033

[10] Moran P(2015)Adaptation and validation of the King’s Health Questionnaire in Portuguese women with urinary incontinence Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 26 1027-855