A proposed mathematical model to help preoperative planning between RIRS and MiniPerc for renal stones between 10 and 20 mm using holmium:Yag laser (Cyber Ho): the stone management according to size-hardness (SMASH) score

被引:2
作者
Perri, D. [1 ,10 ]
Mazzoleni, F. [1 ]
Besana, U. [1 ]
Pacchetti, A. [1 ]
Morini, E. [1 ]
Calandriello, M. [1 ]
Pastore, A. L. [2 ]
Romero-Otero, J. [3 ]
Bruyere, F. [4 ]
Sighinolfi, M. C. [5 ]
Rocco, B. [5 ]
Micali, S. [6 ]
Gozen, A. S. [7 ]
Liatsikos, E. [8 ]
Roche, J. B. [9 ]
Bozzini, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Azienda Socio Sanit Territoriale Lariana, Dept Urol, Como, Italy
[2] Sapienza Univ, Dept Urol, Rome, Italy
[3] Hosp Univ 12 Octubre, Dept Urol, Madrid, Spain
[4] Bretonneau Hosp, Dept Urol, Tours, France
[5] Osped San Paolo, Dept Urol, Milan, Italy
[6] Univ Modena & Reggio Emilia, Dept Urol, Modena, Italy
[7] SLK Kliniken Heilbronn, Dept Urol, Heilbronn, Germany
[8] Univ Patras, Dept Urol, Patras, Greece
[9] Univ Bordeaux, Dept Urol, Bordeaux, France
[10] Sant Anna Hosp, Dept Urol, Via Ravona 20, I-22042 San Fermo Della Battaglia, Italy
关键词
Holmium; YAG laser; Hounsfield units; MiniPerc; RIRS; Score; PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY; SURGERY; CM;
D O I
10.1007/s00240-024-01536-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To evaluate the performance of a mathematical model to drive preoperative planning between RIRS and MiniPerc (MP) for the treatment of renal stones between 10 and 20 mm. Patients with a renal stone between 10 and 20 mm were enrolled. A mathematical model named Stone Management According to Size-Hardness (SMASH) score was calculated: hounsfield units (HU) chi stone maximum size (cm)/100. Patients were divided into 4 groups: RIRS with score < 15 (Group A), RIRS with score >= 15 (Group B), MP with score < 15 (Group C), MP with score >= 15 (Group D). Cyber Ho device was always used. Stone free rate (SFR) was assessed after 3 months. Complication rate and need for auxiliary procedures were evaluated. Between January 2019 and December 2021, 350 patients were enrolled (87, 88, 82 and 93 in Groups A, B, C and D). Mean stone size was 13.1 vs 13.3 mm in Group A vs B (p = 0.18) and 16.2 vs 18.1 mm in Group C vs D (p = 0.12). SFR was 82%, 61%, 75% and 85% for Groups A, B, C and D. SFR was comparable between Groups C and D (p = 0.32) and Groups A and C (p = 0.22). SFR was significantly higher in Group A over B (p = 0.03) and in Group D over B (p = 0.02). Complication rate was 2.2%, 3.4%, 12.1%, 12.9% for Groups A, B, C, D. RIRS and MP are both safe and effective. The mathematical model with the proposed cut-off allowed a proper allocation of patients between endoscopic and percutaneous approaches.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Abd El Hamed AM, 2017, TURK J UROL, V43, P158, DOI 10.5152/tud.2017.61257
[2]   Role of Preoperative Renal Stone Complexity Assessment by Guy's Stone Score as a Predictor of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Outcomes [J].
Adapala, Rajesh Kumar Reddy ;
Prabhu, G. G. Laxman ;
Shetty, Ranjit ;
Yalla, Durga Rao ;
Rakesh, Bisalehalli ;
Venugopal, Padmanabha .
UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2021, 105 (7-8) :548-553
[3]   Retrograde intra renal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones &gt;2 cm. A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Barone, Biagio ;
Crocetto, Felice ;
Vitale, Raffaele ;
Di Domenico, Dante ;
Caputo, Vincenzo ;
Romano, Francesco ;
De Luca, Luigi ;
Bada, Maida ;
Imbimbo, Ciro ;
Prezioso, Domenico .
MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2020, 72 (04) :441-450
[4]   Comparison of STONE score, Guy's stone score and Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) score as predictive tools for percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcome: a prospective study [J].
Biswas, Krishnendu ;
Gupta, Shailendra Kumar ;
Tak, Gopal R. ;
Ganpule, Arvind P. ;
Sabnis, Ravindra B. ;
Desai, Mahesh R. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 126 (04) :494-501
[5]   Application of STONE Nephrolithometry Score for Prediction of Stone-Free Status and Complication Rates in Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Nephrolitotomy for Renal Stone [J].
Danis, Eyyup ;
Polat, Emre Can ;
Bozkurt, Muammer ;
Erkoc, Mustafa ;
Can, Osman ;
Altunrende, Fatih ;
Otunctemur, Alper .
JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 32 (04) :372-377
[6]   Optimization of shockwave lithotripsy use for single medium sized hard renal stone with stone density ≥ 1000 HU. A prospective study [J].
Elbaset, M. A. ;
Taha, Diaa-Eldin ;
Anas, Marwan ;
Abouelkheir, Rasha T. ;
Edwan, Mohamed ;
Abdullateef, Muhamad ;
Ashour, Rawdy ;
Osman, Yasser ;
Sheir, K. Z. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 40 (01) :243-250
[7]   Novel prediction scoring system for simple assessment of stone-free status after flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy: TOHO. score [J].
Hori, Shunsuke ;
Otsuki, Hideo ;
Fujio, Kei ;
Kobayashi, Hideyuki ;
Nagao, Koichi ;
Nakajima, Koichi ;
Mitsui, Yozo .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 27 (09) :742-747
[8]   Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity Score for Predicting Stone-Free Rate after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy [J].
Jeong, Chang Wook ;
Jung, Jin-Woo ;
Cha, Woo Heon ;
Lee, Byung Ki ;
Lee, Sangchul ;
Jeong, Seong Jin ;
Hong, Sung Kyu ;
Byun, Seok-Soo ;
Lee, Sang Eun .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (06)
[9]   Factors associated with the stone-free status after retrograde intrarenal surgery in children [J].
Kahraman, Oguzhan ;
Dogan, Hasan Serkan ;
Asci, Ahmet ;
Asi, Tariq ;
Haberal, Hakan Bahadir ;
Tekgul, Serdar .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2021,
[10]  
Karsiyakali Nejdet, 2020, Urol J, V17, P352, DOI 10.22037/uj.v0i0.5256