Process evaluation for OptiBIRTH, a randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention designed to increase rates of vaginal birth after caesarean section

[1] Oakley A(2006)Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions BMJ 332 413-6

[2] Strange V(2008)Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance BMJ 337 a1655-27

[3] Bonell C(2014)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide BMJ 348 g1687-47

[4] Allen E(2015)Improving the organisation of maternal health service delivery and optimising childbirth by increasing vaginal birth after caesarean section through enhanced women-centred care (OptiBIRTH trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN10612254) Trials 16 542-63

[5] Stephenson J(2002)Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions J Epidemiol Community Health 56 119-40

[6] Craig P(2005)Developing a process-evaluation plan for assessing health promotion program implementation: a how-to guide Health Promot Pract 6 134-90

[7] Dieppe P(2013)Process evaluations for cluster-randomised trials of complex interventions: a proposed framework for design and reporting Trials 14 15-63

[8] Macintyre S(2012)‘Groping through the fog’: VBAC (Vaginal birth after Casearean section) – a meta synthesis about women’s experiences BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 12 85-40

[9] Michie S(2015)Clinician-centred interventions to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC): a systematic review BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 15 16-3

[10] Nazareth I(2015)Women-centred interventions to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC): a systematic review Midwifery 31 657-50

[1] Oakley A(2006)Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions BMJ 332 413-6

[2] Strange V(2008)Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance BMJ 337 a1655-27

[3] Bonell C(2014)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide BMJ 348 g1687-47

[4] Allen E(2015)Improving the organisation of maternal health service delivery and optimising childbirth by increasing vaginal birth after caesarean section through enhanced women-centred care (OptiBIRTH trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN10612254) Trials 16 542-63

[5] Stephenson J(2002)Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions J Epidemiol Community Health 56 119-40

[6] Craig P(2005)Developing a process-evaluation plan for assessing health promotion program implementation: a how-to guide Health Promot Pract 6 134-90

[7] Dieppe P(2013)Process evaluations for cluster-randomised trials of complex interventions: a proposed framework for design and reporting Trials 14 15-63

[8] Macintyre S(2012)‘Groping through the fog’: VBAC (Vaginal birth after Casearean section) – a meta synthesis about women’s experiences BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 12 85-40

[9] Michie S(2015)Clinician-centred interventions to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC): a systematic review BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 15 16-3

[10] Nazareth I(2015)Women-centred interventions to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC): a systematic review Midwifery 31 657-50