Managerial Ownership and Agency Cost: Evidence from Bangladesh

被引:0
作者
Afzalur Rashid
机构
[1] University of Southern Queensland,School of Commerce
来源
Journal of Business Ethics | 2016年 / 137卷
关键词
Agency theory; Agency cost; Bangladesh; Control; Corporate governance; Stewardship theory; G32; G34;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study examines the influence of managerial ownership on firm agency costs among listed firms in Bangladesh. This is an institutional setting that features a mixture of agency costs. This institutional setting has a concentration of ownership by managers, but the firms are not solely owned by managers. The extant literature suggests that the sacrifice of wealth by the principal and potential costs associated with monitoring the agents is known as the agency cost. This study uses three measures of agency cost: the ‘expense ratio’, the ‘Q-free cash flow interaction’, and the ‘asset utilisation ratio’. The finding of the study is that managerial ownership reduces the firm agency cost only under the ‘asset utilisation ratio’ measure of agency cost; this is robust with regard to a number of robustness tests. Furthermore, the non-linearity tests suggest that the convergence of interest is evident with very high and low levels of managerial ownership. The entrenchment effect by the owners is evident at moderate levels of managerial ownership. Although there has been great scepticism among management researchers on the validity of agency theory, overall, the findings of this study do not reject the validity of agency theory. Given that the entrenchment by managers is evident at certain levels of ownership and that the agency problem may still exist between insiders and outsiders, legislative guidelines for controlling share ownership may be required.
引用
收藏
页码:609 / 621
页数:12
相关论文
共 100 条
[11]  
Cho MH(1985)The Structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences Journal of Political Economy 93 1155-1177
[12]  
Colombo MG(2000)Privatization in emerging economies: An agency theory perspective Academy of Management Review 25 650-659
[13]  
Croce A(1991)Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns Australian Journal of Management 16 49-69
[14]  
Murtinu S(1994)Boards and company performance-research challenges the conventional wisdom Corporate Governance an International Review 2 151-160
[15]  
Core JE(2000)Security analysis, agency costs and company characteristics Financial Analysts Journal 56 54-63
[16]  
Holthausen RW(1989)Agency theory: An assessment and review The Academy of Management Review 14 57-74
[17]  
Larcker DF(2005)Agency costs and ownership structure in Australia Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 13 29-52
[18]  
Dalton DR(2008)Agency costs and corporate governance mechanisms: Evidence for UK firms International Journal of Managerial Finance 4 37-59
[19]  
Daily CM(2002)Board leadership structure and CEO turnover Journal of Corporate Finance 8 49-66
[20]  
Ellstrand AE(1985)The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions Journal of Accounting and Economics 7 85-107