Lisinopril in the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure in Elderly Patients: Comparison versus Captopril

被引:0
作者
Carmine Morisco
Mario Condorelli
Gaetano Crepaldi
Paolo Rizzon
Piero Zardini
Gianmarco Villa
Luigi Argenziano
Bruno Trimarco
机构
[1] Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo Neuromed,Istituto di Medicina Interna
[2] Università FEDERICO II1,Istituto di Medicina Interna
[3] Università degli Studi di Padova,Clinica Medica
[4] I Policlinico,Divisione Clinicizzata di Cardiologia
[5] Ospedale Civile Maggiore,Divisione Farmaceutici
[6] Zeneca S.p.A.,undefined
来源
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy | 1997年 / 11卷
关键词
ACE inhibitors; exercise tolerance; ejection fraction; therapy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The present study was performed in order to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of lisinopril, a long-acting angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, with captopril, the shorter acting ACE inhibitor available, in the treatment of elderly patients (mean age 70 ± 0.5 years) with congestive heart failure (mean left ventricular ejection fraction 33.5 ± 1%). The study was organized according to a double-blind, parallel-group, randomized multicenter protocol. After a 14-day placebo run-in period, patients were randomized to receive either lisinopril 5 mg orally once per day or captopril 12.5 mg orally once per day. The dose of the study drug could be doubled at 2-week intervals for 6 weeks. The maximal dose was lisinopril 20 mg once per day or captopril 25 mg twice per day. The addition of either captopril or lisinopril to a regimen of diuretics caused a significant increase in exercise tolerance assessed by bicycle ergometry after 12 weeks of treatment (530 ± 21 seconds vs. 431 ± 13 seconds, p < 0.01; 555 ± 19 seconds vs. 463 ± 12 seconds, p < 0.01, respectively). Both drugs significantly increased left ventricular ejection fraction and stroke volume, were equally effective in improving NYHA class, and were well tolerated, with no differences detectable between treatments. The results of this study indicate that lisinopril 5–20 mg once daily is at least as effective and well tolerated as captopril 12.5–50 mg daily in the treatment of elderly patients with congestive heart failure.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 69
页数:6
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] Kramer BL(1983)Controlled trial of captopril in chronic heart failure: A rest and exercise hemodynamic study Circulation 67 807-816
  • [2] Massie BM(1984)Enalapril in patients with chronic heart failure: A placebo-controlled randomized, double blind study Circulation 70 271-278
  • [3] Topie N.(1985)Effects of enalapril, a new angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, in controlled trial on heart failure J Am Coll Cardiol 5 101-107
  • [4] Shape DN(1987)Effects of enalapril on mortality in severe congestive heart failure: Results of the Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study (CONSENSUS) N Engl J Med 316 1429-1435
  • [5] Murphy J(1989)Short-and long-acting angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor: A randomized trial of lisinopril versus captopril in the treatment of congestive heart failure J Am Coll Cardiol 13 1240-1247
  • [6] Coxon R(1992)Long-acting angitensin-converting enzyme inhibition: Once-daily lisinopril versus twice-daily captopril in mild to moderate heart failure Am J Cardiol 70 70C-77C
  • [7] Hannan SF.(1986)Comparison of captopril and enalapril in patients with severe chronic heart failure N Engl J Med 315 847-853
  • [8] Franciosa JA(1988)Evaluation of the safety of the enalapril in the treatment of heart failure in the very old Eur J Clin Pharmacol 35 1143-1150
  • [9] Wilen MM(1986)Captopril in elderly patients with heart failure Br Med J 293 239-240
  • [10] Jordan R.(1992)Effect of captopril on functional, physiological and biochemical outcome criteria in aged heart failure patients Br J Clin Pharmacol 33 167-178