Addressing the effect of meteorological factors and agricultural subsidy on agricultural productivity in India: a roadmap toward environmental sustainability

被引:0
|
作者
Imran Ali Baig
Muhammad Irfan
Md. Abdus Salam
Cem Işik
机构
[1] National Institute of Technology,Department of Humanities & Social Science
[2] Beijing Institute of Technology,School of Management and Economics
[3] Beijing Institute of Technology,Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research
[4] Ilma University,Department of Business Administration
[5] Aligarh Muslim University,Department of Economics
[6] Anadolu University,Faculty of Tourism
关键词
Agricultural subsidy; Climate hazard; Non-climatic factors; Environmental regulations; Food grain; India;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In the last two decades, the extensive literature that has measured agricultural productivity and growth rate remains controversial and provides few strategies about its main determinants. The present study aims to find out the key determinants of food grain yield (FGY) and examine the role of climate change and agricultural subsidy (SUB) in the context of India using annually data spanning from 1991 to 2018. The current study applied the ARDL modelling to investigate the impacts of climatic factors (average rainfall (RF), mean temperature (AT), and carbon emission (CO2) and agricultural subsidy (SUB) on food grain yield (FGY) in the short-and long-term in India. The estimated outcomes indicate that climatic factors such as RF have a positive impact while AT and CO2 have a negative effect on FGY. Similarly, non-climate variables such as gross capital formation (GCF) and fertilizer usage (FERT) positively contributed to FGY, while the area under crop (LUC), SUB, and employment (AL) negatively affected FGY in India. The results from Granger causality divulge that climatic and non-climatic elements are the main determinants of food grain yield, which have been playing play a significant role in enhancing food grain production and ensuring food security in India. Based on empirical outcomes and findings, some key policy implications emerged. Precisely, government and policy developers should focus on technological innovation and precision agriculture to increase agriculture production and productivity. Government should create funds to curb the climate change problem and promote eco-friendly renewable energy.
引用
收藏
页码:15881 / 15898
页数:17
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [31] Determining the influencing factors of consumers’ attitude toward renewable energy adoption in developing countries: a roadmap toward environmental sustainability and green energy technologies
    Mirza Huzaifa Asif
    Tan Zhongfu
    Azer Dilanchiev
    Muhammad Irfan
    Elchin Eyvazov
    Bilal Ahmad
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 47861 - 47872
  • [32] Nutrient controlled release behaviors and plant growth of NPK encapsulated hydroxyapatite/alginate biocomposite toward agricultural and environmental sustainability
    Nooeaid, Patcharakamon
    Cha-aim, Kamonchai
    Chuysinuan, Piyachat
    Pengsuk, Chalinan
    Thanyacharoern, Thanyaluck
    Sophonputtanaphoca, Supaporn
    Techasakul, Supanna
    MATERIALS RESEARCH EXPRESS, 2024, 11 (03)
  • [33] Effect of pH on aluminum uptake and differential aluminum tolerance in cyanobacterial strains: A bioresource for agricultural and environmental sustainability
    Shamim, Adeeba
    Tripathi, Gyanendra
    Ansari, Jamal Akhtar
    Mahfooz, Sadaf
    Mahdi, Abbas Ali
    Khan, Abdul Rahman
    Farooqui, Alvina
    Mishra, Vishal
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY REPORTS, 2022, 18
  • [34] Exploring the synergistic effect of recycled glass fibres and agricultural waste ash on concrete strength and environmental sustainability
    Mkilima, Timoth
    Sabitov, Yerlan
    Shakhmov, Zhanbolat
    Abilmazhenov, Talgat
    Tlegenov, Askar
    Jumabayev, Atogali
    Turashev, Agzhaik
    Kaliyeva, Zhanar
    CLEANER ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 20
  • [35] Impact of technological innovation on agricultural green total factor productivity in China: considering the threshold effect of environmental regulation
    Li, Hongli
    Zhang, Lu
    Zhang, Junbiao
    Li, Wenjing
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 68 (05) : 1057 - 1081
  • [36] Analysing the interplay between energy transition, resource consumption, deforestation, and environmental factors on agricultural productivity: Insights from APEC countries
    Zhou, Zhongmin
    Sharif, Arshian
    Inglesi-Lotz, Roula
    Bashir, Muhammad Farhan
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 446
  • [37] The Effect of Agricultural Environmental Total Factor Productivity on Urban-Rural Income Gap: Integrated View from China
    Li, Qiang
    Wu, Xiaohang
    Zhang, Yi
    Wang, Yafei
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (08)
  • [38] Effect of environmental factors on the abundance variations of two native rodents in agricultural systems of Buenos Aires, Argentina
    Guidobono, Juan S.
    Cueto, Gerardo R.
    Teta, Pablo
    Busch, Maria
    AUSTRAL ECOLOGY, 2019, 44 (01) : 36 - 48
  • [39] Supply-shock, demand-induced or superposition effect? The impacts of formal and informal environmental regulations on total factor productivity of Chinese agricultural enterprises
    Liu, Yunqiang
    She, Yanan
    Liu, Sha
    Lan, Hongxing
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 380
  • [40] Effect of some environmental factors on milk yield traits in a Brown Swiss herd reared at the Bahri Dagdas International Agricultural Research Institute
    Tilki, M
    Inal, S
    Çolak, M
    Tekin, ME
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF VETERINARY & ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2003, 27 (06): : 1335 - 1341