Shareholder Primacy, Corporate Social Responsibility, and the Role of Business Schools

被引:0
作者
N. Craig Smith
David Rönnegard
机构
[1] INSEAD,
来源
Journal of Business Ethics | 2016年 / 134卷
关键词
Corporate social responsibility; Shareholder primacy; Shareholder value maximization; Business schools; Corporate law; Fiduciary duties; Benefit corporations;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper examines the shareholder primacy norm (SPN) as a widely acknowledged impediment to corporate social responsibility and explores the role of business schools in promoting the SPN but also potentially as an avenue for change by addressing misconceptions about shareholder primacy and the purpose of business. We start by explaining the SPN and then review its status under US and UK laws and show that it is not a likely legal requirement, at least under the guise of shareholder value maximization. This is in contrast to the common assertion that managers are legally constrained from addressing CSR issues if doing so is inconsistent with the economic interests of shareholders. Nonetheless, while the SPN might be muted as a legal norm, we show that it is certainly evident as a social norm among managers and in business schools—reflective, in part, of the sole voting rights of shareholders on corporate boards and of the dominance of shareholder theory—and justifiably so in the view of many managers and business academics. We argue that this view is misguided, not least when associated with claims of a purported legally enforceable requirement to maximize shareholder value. We propose two ways by which the influence of the SPN among managers might be attenuated: extending fiduciary duties of executives to non-shareholder stakeholders and changes in business school teaching such that it covers a plurality of conceptions of the purpose of the corporation.
引用
收藏
页码:463 / 478
页数:15
相关论文
共 85 条
  • [1] Anderson E(2000)Beyond homo economics: New developments in theories of social norms Philosophy & Public Affairs 29 170-200
  • [2] Bennis WG(2005)How business schools lost their way Harvard Business Review 83 96-104
  • [3] O’Toole J(2007)Corporate governance: What can we learn from public governance? Academy of Management Review 32 92-104
  • [4] Benz M(1931)Corporate powers as powers of trust Harvard Law Review 44 1049-1074
  • [5] Frey BS(1932)For whom are corporate mangers trustees: A note Harvard Law Review 45 1365-1372
  • [6] Berle AA(1994)Fiduciary duties and the shareholder-management relation: Or, what’s so special about shareholders? Business Ethics Quarterly 4 393-407
  • [7] Berle AA(2005)Some philosophical issues in corporate governance: The role of property in stakeholder theory Corporate Governance 5 34-47
  • [8] Boatright JR(2007)Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility Academy of Management Review 32 946-967
  • [9] Bonnafous-Boucher M(2007)Stakeholders vs. shareholders in corporate governance Journal of Corporate Governance 6 7-45
  • [10] Campbell JL(2012)How benefit corporations are redefining the purpose of business corporations William Mitchell Law Review 38 817-851