How to choose the best category for a protected area? A multicriteria analysis method based on ecosystem services conservation

被引:0
作者
Apoena Calixto Figueiroa
Andre de Souza de Lima
Marinez Eymael Garcia Scherer
Jarbas Bonetti
机构
[1] Federal University of Santa Catarina,Centro de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas, Departamento de Geociências
来源
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment | 2020年 / 192卷
关键词
Ecosystem services; Analytic hierarchy process; Spatial analysis; Management categories; Carijós Ecological Station;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study proposes a novel methodology to define protected area (PA) categories based on the analysis of how much a PA can protect important ecosystem services (ESs). PA are important tools to minimize the continuing global biodiversity conservation crisis. However, the contribution of PA to conservation is variable, mainly due to the diverse management categories with which they can be associated. In order to support the assignment of a PA to a management category, a multicriteria analysis (MCA) strategy was developed. Essentially, it consisted of the application of an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and its association to management categories that could support the conservation of the most significant ESs. To test the methodology, the framework was applied to the Carijós Ecological Station (ESEC Carijós), Santa Catarina, Brazil, and its surrounding area of influence. Using the IUCN list of categories for the case study, it was found that IUCN Ia and IV could be the most efficient measures to protect important ESs at ESEC Carijós. Although the methodology was applied to a particular case, it could be employed worldwide, establishing the best category to be assigned to an existing or proposed potential PA.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 234 条
[11]  
Quader S(2013)Comparing land-use alternatives: using the ecosystem services concept to define a multi-criteria decision analysis Ecological Economics 93 128-367
[12]  
Aricò S(2015)Habitat loss and the effectiveness of protected areas in the Cerrado biodiversity hotspot Natureza e Conservação 13 35-18
[13]  
Arinaitwe J(2010)Replacing underperforming protected areas achieves better conservation outcomes Nature 466 365-719
[14]  
Balman M(2012)The role of expert opinion in environmental modelling Environmental Modelling & Software 36 4-805
[15]  
Bennun LA(2004)Inconsistent and contradictory judgements in pairwise comparison method in AHP Computers & Operations Research 31 713-65
[16]  
Bertzky B(2013)Protected areas and effective biodiversity conservation Science 342 803-38
[17]  
Besançon C(2004)GIS-based land-use suitability analysis: a critical overview Progress in Planning 62 3-64
[18]  
Boucher TM(2012)Eliciting expert knowledge in conservation science Conservation Biology 26 29-9
[19]  
Brooks TM(2006)Evolução das tipologias e categorias de áreas protegidas no Brasil Ambiente & Sociedade 9 41-386
[20]  
Burfield IJ(2017)Biodiversity conservation gaps in the Brazilian protected areas Scientific Reports 7 1-90