Statistical properties of QTL linkage mapping in biparental genetic populations

被引:0
作者
H Li
S Hearne
M Bänziger
Z Li
J Wang
机构
[1] Institute of Crop Science,
[2] The National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement and CIMMYT China,undefined
[3] Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences,undefined
[4] School of Mathematical Sciences,undefined
[5] Beijing Normal University,undefined
[6] International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA),undefined
[7] International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT),undefined
来源
Heredity | 2010年 / 105卷
关键词
confidence interval; false discovery rate; inclusive composite interval mapping; population size; statistical power;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Quantitative trait gene or locus (QTL) mapping is routinely used in genetic analysis of complex traits. Especially in practical breeding programs, questions remain such as how large a population and what level of marker density are needed to detect QTLs that are useful to breeders, and how likely it is that the target QTL will be detected with the data set in hand. Some answers can be found in studies on conventional interval mapping (IM). However, it is not clear whether the conclusions obtained from IM are the same as those obtained using other methods. Inclusive composite interval mapping (ICIM) is a useful step forward that highlights the importance of model selection and interval testing in QTL linkage mapping. In this study, we investigate the statistical properties of ICIM compared with IM through simulation. Results indicate that IM is less responsive to marker density and population size (PS). The increase in marker density helps ICIM identify independent QTLs explaining >5% of phenotypic variance. When PS is >200, ICIM achieves unbiased estimations of QTL position and effect. For smaller PS, there is a tendency for the QTL to be located toward the center of the chromosome, with its effect overestimated. The use of dense markers makes linked QTL isolated by empty marker intervals and thus improves mapping efficiency. However, only large-sized populations can take advantage of densely distributed markers. These findings are different from those previously found in IM, indicating great improvements with ICIM.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 267
页数:10
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Benjamini Y(1995)Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing J R Stat Soc Series B 57 289-300
  • [2] Hochberg Y(2008)Extending the modified Bayesian information criterion (mBIC) to dense markers and multiple interval mapping Biometrics 64 1162-1169
  • [3] Bogdan M(2005)Biased estimators of quantitative trait locus heritability and location in interval mapping Heredity 95 476-484
  • [4] Biecek P(2009)The genetic architecture of maize flowering time Science 325 714-718
  • [5] Cheng R(1993)Detecting marker-QTL linkage and estimating QTL gene effect and map location using a saturated genetic map Genetics 134 943-951
  • [6] Frommlet F(1999)Statistical methods for mapping quantitative trait loci from a dense set of markers Genetics 151 373-386
  • [7] Ghosh JK(1989)Mapping Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps Genetics 121 185-199
  • [8] Doerge RW(2007)A modified algorithm for the improvement of composite interval mapping Genetics 175 361-374
  • [9] Bogdan M(2008)Inclusive composite interval mapping (ICIM) for digenic epistasis of quantitative traits in biparental populations Theor Appl Genet 116 243-260
  • [10] Doerge RW(2004)A simulation study on the accuracy of position and effect estimates of linked QTL and their asymptotic standard deviations using multiple interval mapping in an F Genet Sel Evol 36 455-479