Design and Impact of a Teacher Training Course, and Attitude Change Concerning Educational Robotics

被引:0
作者
Emanuela Castro
Francesca Cecchi
Pericle Salvini
Massimiliano Valente
Elisa Buselli
Laura Menichetti
Antonio Calvani
Paolo Dario
机构
[1] Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna,The BioRobotics Institute
[2] University of Florence,Department of Educational Science and Psychology
来源
International Journal of Social Robotics | 2018年 / 10卷
关键词
Educational Robotics; Training course; Pedagogy; STEM; Teacher attitude;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Current initiatives and laboratories concerning Educational Robotics (ER) are often not based on strong pedagogical backgrounds. Additionally, they are carried out by inadequately trained teachers, and are not evaluated properly in terms of effectiveness. Moreover, according to teachers, ER usability is often neglected. The main goal of the present article is to present a training course on ER (Edu.Ro.Co.), grounded in pedagogical insights, and to discuss the results of the course and teacher’s opinion about ER in terms of: (i) teachers’ attitudes and perceptions of using ER; (ii) the potential impact of ER on students’ key competences for lifelong learning; and (iii) strengths and weaknesses of ER. These aspects were analysed by means of questionnaires specifically designed by the authors, and administered before and after the training course. A total of 339 teachers attended the training course and 254 completed the questionnaires. The article describes the methodology utilised in the realisation of the course and analyses the questionnaire’s results. In particular, the number of teachers that considered themselves prepared to apply ER significantly improved after the training course. ER is considered by teachers an important tool for the improvement of students’ motivation, planning skills, team working, problem solving and creativity development. Finally, the results from questionnaires indicate that teachers consider ER, a method that improves team-working abilities and motivation in the students. In contrast, the main disadvantage is the cost of the robotic kits. Based on these results, new directions for future research in ER are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:669 / 685
页数:16
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
Benitti FBV(2012)Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: a systematic review Comput Educ 58 978-988
[2]  
Alimisis D(2013)Educational robotics: open questions and new challenges Themes Sci Technol Educ 6 63-71
[3]  
Papert S(1991)Situating constructionism Constructionism 36 1-11
[4]  
Harel I(2016)The game of science: an experiment in synthetic roboethology with primary school children IEEE Robot Autom Mag 23 24-29
[5]  
Datteri E(1993)Motivation in the classroom: reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year J Educ Psychol 85 571-31
[6]  
Zecca L(2015)Robotics to promote elementary education pre-service teachers’ STEM engagement, learning, and teaching Comput Educ 91 14-482
[7]  
Skinner EA(2004)Predicting high school students’ cognitive engagement and achievement: contributions of classroom perceptions and motivation Contemp Educ Psychol 29 462-194
[8]  
Belmont MJ(2013)Not girly, not sexy, not glamorous: primary school girls’ and parents’ constructions of science aspirations Pedagogy Cult Soc 21 171-685
[9]  
Kim C(2010)Eyeballs in the fridge: sources of early interest in science Int J Sci Educ 32 669-128
[10]  
Kim D(2017)Nonverbal immediacy as a characterisation of social behaviour for human-robot interaction Int J Soc Robot 9 109-492