Relations Between Anxiety Sensitivity and Attachment Style Dimensions

被引:0
作者
Margo C. Watt
Lachlan A. McWilliams
Anna G. Campbell
机构
[1] St. Francis Xavier University,Department of Psychology
[2] Dalhousie University,Department of Psychology
[3] University of Manitoba,undefined
[4] University of New Brunswick,undefined
[5] St. Francis Xavier University,undefined
来源
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment | 2005年 / 27卷
关键词
anxiety; sensitivity; attachment; Model of Self; Model of Others;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study replicated and extended the work of C. F. Weems, S. L. Berman, W. K. Silverman, and E. T. Rodriquez (2002) by investigating relations between anxiety sensitivity (AS) and attachment dimensions in a sample of young adults. Two hundred and twenty-six undergraduate students completed self-report measures including the Anxiety Sensitivity Index and the measure of adult romantic attachment used by C. F. Weems et al. (2002). In order to investigate the association between AS and a different domain of attachment, a measure of adult attachment referring to “close relationships” was included. As defined by both measures, insecurely attached individuals, specifically those classified as preoccupied and fearful (i.e., those with negative Models of Self), reported significantly higher levels of AS than those with secure and dismissing attachment styles (i.e., those with positive Models of Self). Results indicated that across both measures the Model of Self attachment dimension accounted for unique variance in AS levels beyond that contributed by trait anxiety. The Model of Others attachment dimension had a more limited association with AS.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 200
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Attachment and Its Relationship to Anxiety Sensitivity
    Robert C. Intrieri
    Samantha J. Margentina
    Current Psychology, 2019, 38 : 213 - 227
  • [22] Moderator Role of Looming Cognitive Style (LCS) in the Relationship Between Attentional Control and Anxiety: Difference Between Shifting and Focusing Dimensions
    Altan-Atalay, Ayse
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 152 (07) : 445 - 455
  • [23] Relationship between the dimensions of anxiety sensitivity and the symptoms of anxiety in clinical and non-clinical populations
    Khawaja, Nigar G.
    Brooks, Belinda
    Armstrong, Kerry A.
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 60 (01) : 53 - 61
  • [24] Relationship between the Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale (SCORS) and attachment style in a clinical sample
    Stein, Michelle B.
    Siefert, Caleb J.
    Stewart, Rosemarie Vala
    Hilsenroth, Mark J.
    CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY & PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2011, 18 (06) : 512 - 523
  • [25] Attachment style, anxiety coping, and personality-styles in withdrawn alcohol addicted inpatients
    Wedekind, Dirk
    Bandelow, Borwin
    Heitmann, Soren
    Havemann-Reinecke, Ursula
    Engel, Kirsten R.
    Huether, Gerald
    SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT PREVENTION AND POLICY, 2013, 8
  • [26] Attachment style, anxiety coping, and personality-styles in withdrawn alcohol addicted inpatients
    Dirk Wedekind
    Borwin Bandelow
    Soren Heitmann
    Ursula Havemann-Reinecke
    Kirsten R Engel
    Gerald Huether
    Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 8
  • [27] Dimensions of anxiety sensitivity and their relationship to nonclinical panic
    Deacon, BJ
    Valentiner, DP
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT, 2001, 23 (01) : 25 - 33
  • [28] Dimensions of Anxiety Sensitivity and Their Relationship to Nonclinical Panic
    Brett J. Deacon
    David P. Valentiner
    Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 2001, 23 : 25 - 33
  • [29] Relationship between insecure attachment and physical symptom severity is mediated by sensory sensitivity
    Le, Thao Lan
    Geist, Rose
    Hunter, Jon
    Maunder, Robert G.
    BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR, 2020, 10 (08):
  • [30] Self-reported attachment style, attachment quality, and symptoms of anxiety and depression in young adolescents
    Muris, P
    Meesters, C
    van Melick, M
    Zwambag, L
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2001, 30 (05) : 809 - 818