A time-series analysis framework for the flood-wave method to estimate groundwater model parameters; [La méthode de l’onde de crue appliquée dans le cadre d’analyses de séries de niveaux piézométriques dans le but d’estimer des paramètres de modèles d’écoulement d’eau souterraine]; [Uma abordagem por análise de series temporais para o método da onda de inundação ao estimar parâmetros de modelos de águas subterrâneas]; [Un marco de análisis de series de tiempo en el método de la onda de crecida para estimar los parámetros de un modelo de agua subterránea]

被引:0
作者
Obergfell C. [1 ]
Bakker M. [1 ]
Maas K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Water Resources Section, Delft University of Technology, Delft
[2] KWR Watercycle Research Institute, Nieuwegein
关键词
Analytical solutions; Groundwater/surface-water relations; Numerical modeling; The Netherlands; Time series analysis;
D O I
10.1007/s10040-016-1436-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The flood-wave method is implemented within the framework of time-series analysis to estimate aquifer parameters for use in a groundwater model. The resulting extended flood-wave method is applicable to situations where groundwater fluctuations are affected significantly by time-varying precipitation and evaporation. Response functions for time-series analysis are generated with an analytic groundwater model describing stream–aquifer interaction. Analytical response functions play the same role as the well function in a pumping test, which is to translate observed head variations into groundwater model parameters by means of a parsimonious model equation. An important difference as compared to the traditional flood-wave method and pumping tests is that aquifer parameters are inferred from the combined effects of precipitation, evaporation, and stream stage fluctuations. Naturally occurring fluctuations are separated in contributions from different stresses. The proposed method is illustrated with data collected near a lowland river in the Netherlands. Special emphasis is put on the interpretation of the streambed resistance. The resistance of the streambed is the result of stream-line contraction instead of a semi-pervious streambed, which is concluded through comparison with the head loss calculated with an analytical two-dimensional cross-section model. © 2016, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:1807 / 1819
页数:12
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Barlow P.M., DeSimone L.A., Moench A.F., Aquifer response to stream-stage and recharge variations, II: convolution method and applications, J Hydrol, 230, pp. 211-229, (2000)
[2]  
Bartholomeus R.P., Voortman B.R., Witte J.P.M., Measurements and knowledge of hydrological processes are required for accurate estimations of evaporation with groundwater models (in Dutch), Stromingen, 19, 2, pp. 37-52, (2013)
[3]  
Besbes M., de Marsily G., From infiltration to recharge: use of a parametric transfer function, J Hydrol, 74, pp. 271-293, (1984)
[4]  
Box G.E.P., Jenkins G.M., Time series analysis: forecasting and control, (1976)
[5]  
Cooper H.H., Rorabaugh M.I., Ground-water movements and bank storage due to flood stages in surface streams, US Geol Surv Water Suppl Pap 1536-J, (1963)
[6]  
Ha K., Koh D.-C., Yum B.-W., Lee K.-K., Estimation of layered aquifer diffusivity and river resistance using flood wave response model, J Hydrol, 337, pp. 284-293, (2007)
[7]  
Hall F.R., Moench A.F., Application of the convolution equation to stream–aquifer relationships, Water Resour Res, 8, pp. 487-493, (1972)
[8]  
Hemker C.J., de Boer R.G., MicroFEM, 4.10.42 finite element method groundwater flow simulations computer program, (1997)
[9]  
Hespanha J.P., Linear systems theory, Princeton University Press, (2009)
[10]  
Hill M.C., Methods and guidelines for effective model calibration, US Geol Surv Water Resour Invest Rep, pp. 98-400, (1998)