Imaging in rheumatoid arthritis: the role of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography

被引:0
作者
Mikkel Østergaard
Mikael Boesen
机构
[1] Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE),Department of Clinical Medicine
[2] Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases,Department of Radiology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital
[3] University of Copenhagen,undefined
[4] University of Copenhagen,undefined
来源
La radiologia medica | 2019年 / 124卷
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Computed tomography; Rheumatoid arthritis; Synovitis; Bone erosion; Tenosynovitis; Bone marrow edema; Diagnosis; Monitoring; Prognostication;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In suspected and diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis (RA), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows detection of all relevant pathologies, such as synovitis, tenosynovitis, bone marrow edema (osteitis), bone erosion and cartilage damage. MRI is more sensitive than clinical examination for monitoring disease activity (i.e., inflammation) and more sensitive than conventional radiography and ultrasonography for monitoring joint destruction. In suspected RA, MRI bone marrow edema predicts development of RA, and in early RA patients, it predicts subsequent structural damage progression. CT is the standard reference imaging modality for visualizing bone damage, including bone erosions in RA, but lacks sensitivity for soft-tissue changes, including synovitis and tenosynovitis. CT has a minimal role in RA clinical trials and practice, except in selected patients where MRI is contraindicated or not available or if crystal arthritis such as gout or pseudo-gout is suspected. MRI has documented utility in diagnosis, monitoring and prognostication of patients with RA and is increasingly used for these purposes in clinical practice and particularly clinical trials.
引用
收藏
页码:1128 / 1141
页数:13
相关论文
共 483 条
[61]  
Sorensen IJ(2007)Rheumatoid arthritis bone erosion volumes on CT and MRI: reliability and correlations with erosion scores on CT, MRI and radiography Ann Rheum Dis 66 1388-800
[62]  
Jensen B(2013)Review: the utility of magnetic resonance imaging for assessing structural damage in randomized controlled trials in rheumatoid arthritis Arthritis Rheum 65 2513-1088
[63]  
Moller JM(1998)The OMERACT filter for outcome measures in rheumatology J Rheumatol 25 198-433
[64]  
Østergaard M(2011)No overall progression and occasional repair of erosions despite persistent inflammation in adalimumab-treated rheumatoid arthritis patients: results from a longitudinal comparative MRI, ultrasonography, CT and radiography study Ann Rheum Dis 70 252-1795
[65]  
Eshed I(2005)The smallest detectable difference and sensitivity to change of magnetic resonance imaging and radiographic scoring of structural joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis finger, wrist, and toe joints: a comparison of the OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis magnetic resonance imaging score applied to different joint combinations and the Sharp/van der Heijde radiographic score Arthritis Rheum 52 2300-1974
[66]  
Althoff CE(2008)Magnetic resonance imaging findings in 84 patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: bone marrow oedema predicts erosive progression Ann Rheum Dis 67 794-8
[67]  
Poggenborg RP(2016)The course of bone marrow edema in early undifferentiated arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: a longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study at bone level Arthritis Rheumatol 68 1080-3773
[68]  
Diekhoff T(2011)MRI in early rheumatoid arthritis: synovitis and bone marrow oedema are independent predictors of subsequent radiographic progression Ann Rheum Dis 70 428-2044
[69]  
Krabbe S(2010)Radiographic progression and remission rates in early rheumatoid arthritis—MRI bone oedema and anti-CCP predicted radiographic progression in the 5-year extension of the double-blind randomised CIMESTRA trial Ann Rheum Dis 69 1789-2967
[70]  
Axelsen MB(2014)Early MRI measures independently predict 1-year and 2-year radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis: secondary analysis from a large clinical trial Ann Rheum Dis 73 1968-2162