Imaging in rheumatoid arthritis: the role of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography

被引:0
作者
Mikkel Østergaard
Mikael Boesen
机构
[1] Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE),Department of Clinical Medicine
[2] Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases,Department of Radiology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital
[3] University of Copenhagen,undefined
[4] University of Copenhagen,undefined
来源
La radiologia medica | 2019年 / 124卷
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Computed tomography; Rheumatoid arthritis; Synovitis; Bone erosion; Tenosynovitis; Bone marrow edema; Diagnosis; Monitoring; Prognostication;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In suspected and diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis (RA), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows detection of all relevant pathologies, such as synovitis, tenosynovitis, bone marrow edema (osteitis), bone erosion and cartilage damage. MRI is more sensitive than clinical examination for monitoring disease activity (i.e., inflammation) and more sensitive than conventional radiography and ultrasonography for monitoring joint destruction. In suspected RA, MRI bone marrow edema predicts development of RA, and in early RA patients, it predicts subsequent structural damage progression. CT is the standard reference imaging modality for visualizing bone damage, including bone erosions in RA, but lacks sensitivity for soft-tissue changes, including synovitis and tenosynovitis. CT has a minimal role in RA clinical trials and practice, except in selected patients where MRI is contraindicated or not available or if crystal arthritis such as gout or pseudo-gout is suspected. MRI has documented utility in diagnosis, monitoring and prognostication of patients with RA and is increasingly used for these purposes in clinical practice and particularly clinical trials.
引用
收藏
页码:1128 / 1141
页数:13
相关论文
共 483 条
  • [1] Combe B(2017)2016 Update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of early arthritis Ann Rheum Dis 76 948-959
  • [2] Landewe R(2013)EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging of the joints in the clinical management of rheumatoid arthritis Ann Rheum Dis 72 804-814
  • [3] Daien CI(2008)Imaging in rheumatoid arthritis–status and recent advances for magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, computed tomography and conventional radiography Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 22 1019-1044
  • [4] Hua C(2017)The OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scoring system: updated recommendations by the OMERACT MRI in arthritis working group J Rheumatol 44 1706-1712
  • [5] Aletaha D(2015)Recommendations of the ESSR arthritis subcommittee for the use of magnetic resonance imaging in musculoskeletal rheumatic diseases Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 19 396-411
  • [6] Alvaro-Gracia JM(2015)Validation of the OMERACT psoriatic arthritis magnetic resonance imaging score (PsAMRIS) for the hand and foot in a randomized placebo-controlled trial J Rheumatol 42 2473-2479
  • [7] Colebatch AN(2009)Reducing invasiveness, duration, and cost of magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatoid arthritis by omitting intravenous contrast injection—does it change the assessment of inflammatory and destructive joint changes by the OMERACT RAMRIS? J Rheumatol 36 1806-1810
  • [8] Edwards CJ(2014)Fat-suppression techniques for 3-T MR imaging of the musculoskeletal system Radiographics 34 217-233
  • [9] Østergaard M(2014)Whole-body MRI assessment of disease activity and structural damage in rheumatoid arthritis: first step towards an MRI joint count Rheumatology (Oxford) 53 845-853
  • [10] van der Heijde D(2011)Whole-body MR imaging in psoriatic arthritis: additional value for therapeutic decision making Eur J Radiol 77 149-155