Contemporary use of arterial and venous conduits in coronary artery bypass grafting: anatomical, functional and clinical aspects

被引:0
作者
G. Cuminetti
S. Gelsomino
S. Curello
R. Lorusso
J. G. Maessen
J. C. A. Hoorntje
机构
[1] Maastricht University Medical Center,Department of Cardiology
[2] Maastricht University Medical Center,Department of Cardiac Surgery
[3] Spedali Civili and University of Brescia,undefined
来源
Netherlands Heart Journal | 2017年 / 25卷
关键词
Graft selection; Coronary artery bypass grafting; Myocardial revascularisation; Hybrid coronary artery revascularisation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Although the benefits of using the left internal mammary artery to bypass the left anterior descending artery (LAD) have been extensively ascertained, freedom from major cardiovascular events and survival after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) also correlate with the completeness of revascularisation. Hence, careful selection of the second-best graft conduit is crucial for CABG success. The more widespread use of saphenous vein grafts contrasts with the well-known long-term efficacy of multiple arterial grafting, which struggles to emerge as the procedure of choice due to concerns over increased technical difficulties and higher risk of postoperative complications. Conduit choice is at the discretion of the operator instead of being discussed by the heart team, where cardiologists are not usually engaged in such decisions due to a hypothetical lack of technical knowledge. Furthermore, according to the ESC/EACTS guidelines, traditional CABG remains the gold standard for multi-vessel coronary artery disease with complex LAD stenosis, but hybrid procedures using percutaneous coronary intervention for non-LAD targets could combine the best of two worlds. With the aim of raising the cardiologist’s awareness of the surgical treatment options, we provide a comprehensive overview of the anatomical, functional and clinical aspects guiding the decision-making process in CABG strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 13
页数:9
相关论文
共 152 条
[51]  
Topol EJ(2011)In off-pump surgery, skeletonized gastroepiploic artery is superior to saphenous vein in patients with bilateral internal thoracic arterial grafts Ann Thorac Surg 91 1159-1164
[52]  
Canham PB(2011)Radial artery grafts vs saphenous vein grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized trial JAMA 305 167-174
[53]  
Finlay HM(2011)The Radial Artery Patency and Clinical Outcomes trial: design, intermediate term results and future direction Heart Lung Circ 20 187-192
[54]  
Boughner DR(2013)Equivalency of right internal thoracic artery and right gastroepiploic artery composite grafts: five-year outcomes Ann Thorac Surg 96 2061-2068
[55]  
Taggart DP(2016)Frequency and predictors of internal mammary artery graft failure and subsequent clinical outcomes: insights from the PREVENT IV trial Circulation 133 131-138
[56]  
He GW(2016)Should Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Be Performed in Patients With Moderate Stenosis of the LAD? Circulation 133 111-113
[57]  
Fan L(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[58]  
Grove KL(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[59]  
Dion R(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[60]  
Glineur D(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined