Limit equilibrium method for slope stability based on assumed stress on slip surface

被引:0
作者
Dong-ping Deng
Lian-heng Zhao
Liang Li
机构
[1] Central South University,School of Civil Engineering
来源
Journal of Central South University | 2016年 / 23卷
关键词
two-dimensional slope; three-dimensional slope; limit equilibrium analysis; normal stress; shear stress; safety factor;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In the limit equilibrium framework, two- and three-dimensional slope stabilities can be solved according to the overall force and moment equilibrium conditions of a sliding body. In this work, based on Mohr-Coulomb (M-C) strength criterion and the initial normal stress without considering the inter-slice (or inter-column) forces, the normal and shear stresses on the slip surface are assumed using some dimensionless variables, and these variables have the same numbers with the force and moment equilibrium equations of a sliding body to establish easily the linear equation groups for solving them. After these variables are determined, the normal stresses, shear stresses, and slope safety factor are also obtained using the stresses assumptions and M-C strength criterion. In the case of a three-dimensional slope stability analysis, three calculation methods, namely, a non-strict method, quasi-strict method, and strict method, can be obtained by satisfying different force and moment equilibrium conditions. Results of the comparison in the classic two- and three-dimensional slope examples show that the slope safety factors calculated using the current method and the other limit equilibrium methods are approximately equal to each other, indicating the feasibility of the current method; further, the following conclusions are obtained: 1) The current method better amends the initial normal and shear stresses acting on the slip surface, and has the identical results with using simplified Bishop method, Spencer method, and Morgenstern-Price (M-P) method; however, the stress curve of the current method is smoother than that obtained using the three abovementioned methods. 2) The current method is suitable for analyzing the two- and three-dimensional slope stability. 3) In the three-dimensional asymmetric sliding body, the non-strict method yields safer solutions, and the results of the quasi-strict method are relatively reasonable and close to those of the strict method, indicating that the quasi-strict method can be used to obtain a reliable slope safety factor.
引用
收藏
页码:2972 / 2983
页数:11
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
Liu S Y(2005)Slope stability analysis using the limit equilibrium method and two finite element methods [J] Computers and Geotechnics 63 291-298
[2]  
Shao L T(2007)Two-dimensional slope stability analysis by limit equilibrium and strength reduction methods [J] Computers and Geotechnics 34 137-150
[3]  
Li H J(2009)Three-dimensional slope failure analysis by the strength reduction and limit equilibrium methods [J] Computers and Geotechnics 36 70-80
[4]  
Cheng Y M(2014)Search for circular and noncircular critical slip surfaces in slope stability analysis by hybrid genetic algorithm [J] Journal of Central South University 21 387-397
[5]  
Lansivaara T(2013)A new hybrid algorithm for global optimization and slope stability evaluation [J] Journal of Central South University 20 3265-3273
[6]  
Wei W B(1993)A general limit equilibrium model for three-dimensional slope stability analysis [J] Canadian Geotechnical Journal 30 905-919
[7]  
Wei W B(2007)Three-dimensional asymmetrical slope stability analysis extension of Bishop’s, Janbu’s, and Morgenstern–Price’s techniques [J] Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 133 1544-1555
[8]  
Cheng Y M(2013)Analysis of stability of three-dimensional slopes using the rigorous limit equilibrium method [J] Engineering Geology 160 21-33
[9]  
Li L(1997)Comparison of slope stability methods of analysis [J] Canadian Geotechnical Journal 14 429-439
[10]  
Zhu J F(1985)Three dimensional analysis of slope stability [J] International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 9 199-223