Drainage and Nitrate Leaching Assessed During 7 Years Under Perennial and Annual Bioenergy Crops

被引:0
作者
Fabien Ferchaud
Bruno Mary
机构
[1] INRA,
[2] UR 1158 AgroImpact,undefined
来源
BioEnergy Research | 2016年 / 9卷
关键词
Bioenergy; Energy crops; Nitrate losses; Drainage; Water balance; Miscanthus; Switchgrass;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Sustainable bioenergy crops must contribute not only to the production of renewable energy but also to maintaining or restoring water resource and quality. The aim of this study was to quantify water drainage and nitrate leaching under perennial (Miscanthus × giganteus and switchgrass), “semi-perennial” (fescue and alfalfa) and annual (sorghum and triticale) bioenergy crops managed with two N fertilisation rates. Soil water and mineral N contents were measured twice a year during 7 consecutive years. These measurements were used to initialize the STICS model which simulated in turn the amounts of drained water and nitrate leached below 210 cm. Semi-perennial crops produced less drainage than annual crops (64 vs. 133 mm year−1) despite a similar biomass production. Perennial crops resulted in an intermediate drainage (90 mm year−1) but a greater biomass production. The drainage was negatively correlated with biomass production for perennial and annual crops. Perennial crops exhibited much higher water use efficiency than the other species. Nitrate concentration in drained water was low for all crops, most often less than 20 mg NO3 l−1. It was lower for perennials than other crops, except for miscanthus on the first year of measurement. However, the comparison of model outputs with nitrate concentrations measured in subsoil after 5 years indicated that the peak of nitrate produced after miscanthus establishment was subsequently recovered by the crop in deep layers (below 210 cm). Perennial bioenergy crops have potential for restoring water quality but may decrease groundwater recharge in deep soils or dry climates.
引用
收藏
页码:656 / 670
页数:14
相关论文
共 248 条
[21]  
Schott C(2003)Reduced nitrogen losses after conversion of row crop agriculture to perennial biofuel crops Eur J Agron 18 309-332
[22]  
Thery S(2012)Nitrate leaching losses under miscanthus grass planted on a silty clay loam soil Agric Ecosyst Environ 147 36-46
[23]  
Viennot P(2015)Effect of nitrogen addition on Miscanthus × giganteus yield, nitrogen losses, and soil organic matter across five sites Environ Model Softw 64 177-190
[24]  
Thieu V(2008)Soil water uptake and root distribution of different perennial and annual bioenergy crops Eur J Agron 29 46-57
[25]  
Billen G(2005)An overview of the crop model STICS Agric Ecosyst Environ 111 292-310
[26]  
Garnier J(2010)Long-term nitrogen dynamics in various catch crop scenarios: test and simulations with STICS model in a temperate climate Glob Chang Biol Bioenergy 2 157-168
[27]  
Benoit M(2014)Accuracy, robustness and behavior of the STICS soil–crop model for plant, water and nitrogen outputs: evaluation over a wide range of agro-environmental conditions in France Soil Sci Soc Am J 78 1584-1593
[28]  
Galloway JN(2015)Evaluation of the soil crop model STICS over 8 years against the “on farm” database of Bruyeres catchment GCB Bioenergy 7 1344-1356
[29]  
Townsend AR(2007)Nitrate leaching in intensive agriculture in Northern France: effect of farming practices, soils and crop rotations Ind Crop Prod 25 75-88
[30]  
Erisman JW(2015)A comparison of canopy evapotranspiration for maize and two perennial grasses identified as potential bioenergy crops Glob Chang Biol Bioenergy 7 811-819