Clinical application of porcine small intestinal submucosa in the management of infected or potentially contaminated abdominal defects

被引:0
作者
Tomio Ueno
Lisa Clark Pickett
Sebastian G. de la Fuente
D. Curtis Lawson
Theodore N. Pappas
机构
[1] Duke University Medical Center,Department of Surgery
[2] Durham VA Medical Center,undefined
[3] Durham Regional Hospital,undefined
[4] Duke University Medical Center,undefined
来源
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | 2004年 / 8卷
关键词
Small intestinal submucosa; SIS; hernia; contaminated field;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The repair of abdominal wall defects in potentially contaminated or grossly infected fields presents a difficult clinical problem. Polypropylene mesh is relatively contraindicated in these settings because of the potential for chronic infection. The alternatives to polypropylene include polyglactin mesh, which is not associated with chronic infection but is associated with a 100% recurrence of hernia. The ideal prosthetic for this patient group should be resistant to infection and ensure a low rate of hernia recurrence. We studied the use of small intestinal submucosa, which has been reported to be resistant to infection and incorporates into the fascia over 3 to 6 months, in 20 patients with ventral or inguinal hernias (18 ventral, 2 inguinal hernia) in the setting of bacterial contamination. The early postoperative complication rate was 50%. One patient with fasciitis had degradation of the small intestinal submucosa and loss of the bioprosthesis within 7 days. Other early complications included seroma (n = 2), ileus (n = 1), and wound infection (n = 8). No patient experienced chronic infection. Mean follow up was 15.7 months and the rate of recurrence documented by CT or physical examination was 30%. We concluded the following: (1) small intestinal submucosa is an effective alternative bioprosthesis in the management of ventral/inguinal hernia when there is associated bacterial contamination; (2) human vs. pig immune response has not been seen in this patient population; (3) early graft failure due to overwhelming fascial infection was noted in one patient and may be a limitation of this technology in a minority of patients; and (4) early hernia recurrence is relatively low but long-term follow-up has not been completed.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 112
页数:3
相关论文
共 131 条
[1]  
Luijendijk RW(2000)A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia N Engl J Med 343 392-8
[2]  
Hop WC(2002)Randomized clinical trial of non-mesh versus mesh repair of primary inguinal hernia Br J Surg 89 293-297
[3]  
van den Tol MP(1987)Repair of large abdominal wall defects with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) Ann Surg 206 765-769
[4]  
de Lange DC(2000)Surgical repair of incisional ventral hernias: tension-free technique using prosthetic materials (expanded polytetrafluoroethylene Gore-Tex Dual Mesh) Am Surg 66 679-682
[5]  
Braaksma MM(1998)Long-term complications associated with prosthetic repair of incisional hernias Arch Surg 133 378-382
[6]  
Ijzermans JN(1989)Polypropylene mesh closure of infected abdominal wounds Am Surg 55 73-76
[7]  
Boelhouwer RU(2003)Definitive surgical treatment of infected or exposed ventral hernia mesh Ann Surg 237 437-441
[8]  
de Vries BC(1981)Management of acute full-thickness losses of the abdominal wall Ann Surg 193 612-618
[9]  
Salu MK(1981)Emergency abdominal wall reconstruction with polypropylene mesh: short-term benefits versus long-term complications Ann Surg 194 219-23
[10]  
Wereldsma JC(1986)Use of an absorbable mesh to repair contaminated abdominal-wall defects Arch Surg 121 954-960