Apical soft tissue biopsies predict biochemical failure in radical perineal prostatectomy patients with apical cancer involvement

被引:0
作者
H R Kübler
S A Szukala
J F Madden
T Y Tseng
D F Paulson
J Vieweg
P Dahm
机构
[1] Duke University Medical Center,Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery
[2] Duke University Medical Center,Department of Pathology
[3] College of Medicine,Department of Urology
[4] Health Science Center,undefined
[5] University of Florida,undefined
来源
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases | 2007年 / 10卷
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; prostatectomy; apex; positive margins;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of the study was to prospectively assess the role of apical soft tissue biopsies in radical perineal prostatectomy (RPP) patients with documented apical prostate cancer (PCA) involvement. Between June 1998 and May 1999, 77 consecutive men with localized PCA and documented invasion of the prostatic apex underwent RPP by a single surgeon. Soft tissue biopsies were systematically obtained from the prostatic fossa overlying the apex at the time of surgery. Time to biochemical failure was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. The rates of positive apical margins and positive apical soft tissue biopsies were 23.4% (18/77) and 15.6% (12/77). The sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of positive apical margins for residual apical disease as determined by apical soft tissue biopsy were 41.7, 80, and 28%, respectively. The overall biochemical failure rate was 28.6% (22/77) with a median follow-up of 51 months (range 3–73 months). The 36-month biochemical recurrence-free survival rate was 55.9±14.9% for patients with positive apical biopsies and 78.7±5.3% for those with negative biopsies (P=0.023). In conclusion, positive apical soft tissue biopsy is an independent predictor of biochemical failure in patients with apical PCA who undergo RPP. Positive apical surgical margins poorly predict residual apical disease that is frequently identifiable by apical soft tissue biopsy. Apical soft tissue biopsies should therefore be obtained in patients with known extensive apical cancer involvement at the time of RPP.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 76
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prognostic indicators in patients with seminal vesicle involvement following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer
    Tefilli, MV
    Gheiler, EL
    Tiguert, R
    Banerjee, M
    Sakr, W
    Grignon, DJ
    Pontes, JE
    Wood, DP
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 160 (03) : 802 - 806
  • [42] The ratio of oleic-to-stearic acid in the prostate predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer
    Kositsawat, Jatupol
    Flanigan, Robert C.
    Meydani, Mohsen
    Choi, Young-Ku
    Freeman, Vincent L.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 178 (06) : 2391 - 2396
  • [43] Long-term hazard of progression after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: Continued rise of biochemical failure after 5 years
    Amling, CL
    Blute, ML
    Bergstralh, EJ
    Seay, TM
    Slezak, J
    Zincke, H
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 164 (01) : 101 - 105
  • [44] Biochemical and pathological effects of 8 months of neoadjuvant androgen withdrawal therapy before radical prostatectomy in patients with clinically confined prostate cancer
    Gleave, ME
    Goldenberg, SL
    Jones, EC
    Bruchovsky, N
    Sullivan, LD
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 155 (01) : 213 - 219
  • [45] CRTC2 as a novel prognostic biomarker for worse pathologic outcomes and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer
    Lee, Hakmin
    Lee, Minseung
    Hong, Sung Kyu
    INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2019, 60 (02) : 84 - 90
  • [46] p53 and bcl-2 immunohistochemistry in pretreatment prostate needle biopsies to predict recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy
    Stackhouse, GB
    Sesterhenn, IA
    Bauer, JJ
    Mostofi, FK
    Connelly, RR
    Srivastava, SK
    Moul, JW
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 162 (06) : 2040 - 2045
  • [47] Socioeconomic status is an independent predictor of biochemical recurrence among patients with prostate cancer who undergo radical prostatectomy
    Srougi, Victor
    Antunes, Alberto A.
    Reis, Sabrina T.
    Dall'Oglio, Marcos F.
    Nesrallah, Adriano J.
    Leite, Ktia R. M.
    Srougi, Miguel
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2011, 37 (04): : 507 - 513
  • [48] Biochemical recurrence in patients with prostate cancer after radical treatment. Comparative study of prostatectomy vs. radiotherapy
    Herranz Amo, Felipe
    San Segundo, Carmen Gonzalez
    Panos Facundo, Eva V.
    Alvarez Gonzalez, Ana
    Gomez Espi, Marina
    Lledo Garcia, Enrique
    Tabares Garcia, Juan
    Verdu Tartajo, Fernando
    Hernandez Fernandez, Carlos
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2012, 65 (01): : 176 - 184
  • [49] Conditional biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy in patients with high-risk prostate cancer
    Park, Sung-Woo
    Hwang, Dae Sung
    Song, Won Hoon
    Nam, Jong Kil
    Lee, Hyun Jung
    Chung, Moon Kee
    PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 8 (04) : 173 - 177
  • [50] Development of a model to predict prostate cancer at the apex (PCAP model) in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Cumarasamy, Shivaram
    Martini, Alberto
    Falagario, Ugo G.
    Gul, Zeynep
    Beksac, Alp T.
    Jayaratna, Isuru
    Haines, George K., III
    Carrieri, Giuseppe
    Tewari, Ash
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 38 (04) : 813 - 819