A prospective observational study to evaluate G-CSF usage in patients with solid tumors receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy in Italian clinical oncology practice

被引:0
作者
S. Barni
V. Lorusso
M. Giordano
G. Sogno
T. Gamucci
A. Santoro
R. Passalacqua
V. Iaffaioli
N. Zilembo
M. Mencoboni
M. Roselli
G. Pappagallo
P. Pronzato
机构
[1] Azienda Ospedaliera Treviglio,Oncology Department
[2] National Cancer Research Centre Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II,Oncology Department
[3] Azienda Ospedaliera Sant’Anna,Oncology Department
[4] Ospedale San Paolo,Oncology Department
[5] Osp SS Trinità,Oncology Department
[6] Humanitas Cancer Center,Oncology Department
[7] Istituti Ospitalieri,Oncology Department “Oncologia Medica 1”
[8] I.N.T. Fondazione G Pascale,Oncology Department
[9] Fondazione IRCCS “Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori”,Oncology Department, Tor Vergata Clinical Center
[10] Ospedale Villa Scassi,Office of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medical Sciences
[11] University of Rome Tor Vergata,Oncology Department A, IST, Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro
[12] Azienda ULSS 13,undefined
[13] IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino,undefined
[14] Ospedale di Treviglio,undefined
来源
Medical Oncology | 2014年 / 31卷
关键词
G-CSF; Solid tumors; Observational study; Oncology practice; Italy; Guidelines;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a severe dose-limiting side effect of myelosuppressive chemotherapy in patients with solid tumors. Clinical practice guidelines recommend primary prophylaxis with G-CSF in patients with an overall ≥20 % risk of FN. AIOM Italian guidelines recommend starting G-CSF within 24–72 h after chemotherapy; for daily G-CSF, administration should continue until the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) is 1 × 109/L post-nadir and should not be terminated after ANC increase in the early days of administration. The aim of this study was to assess guideline adherence in oncology practice in Italy. In this multicenter, prospective, observational study, patients were enrolled at the first G-CSF use in any cycle and were followed for two subsequent cycles (or until the end of chemotherapy if less than two additional cycles). Primary objective was to explore G-CSF use in Italian clinical practice; therefore, data were collected on the G-CSF type, timing of administration, and number of doses. 512 eligible patients were enrolled (median age, 62). The most common tumor types were breast (36 %), lung (18 %), and colorectal (13 %). A total of 1,164 G-CSF cycles (daily G-CSF, 718; pegfilgrastim, 446) were observed. Daily G-CSF was administered later than 72 h after chemotherapy in 42 % of cycles, and the median [range] number of doses was four [1, 10]. Pegfilgrastim was administered later than 72 h in 8 % of cycles. G-CSF prophylaxis in Italy is frequently administered in a manner which is not supported by evidence-based guidelines. As this practice may lead to poor outcomes, educational initiatives are recommended.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]  
Kuderer NM(2006)Mortality, morbidity, and cost associated with febrile neutropenia in adult cancer patients Cancer 106 2258-2266
[2]  
Dale DC(2008)Neutropenia occurrence and predictors of reduced chemotherapy delivery: results from the INC-EU prospective observational European neutropenia study Support Care Cancer 16 1299-1309
[3]  
Crawford J(2009)Optimal delivery of anthracycline-based chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting improves outcome of breast cancer patients Breast Cancer Res Treat 114 479-484
[4]  
Pettengell R(1991)Reduction by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor of fever and neutropenia induced by chemotherapy in patients with small-cell lung cancer N Engl J Med 325 164-170
[5]  
Schwenkglenks M(2005)First and subsequent cycle use of pegfilgrastim prevents febrile neutropenia in patients with breast cancer: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study J Clin Oncol 23 1178-1184
[6]  
Leonard R(2007)Impact of primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on febrile neutropenia and mortality in adult cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: a systematic review J Clin Oncol 25 3158-3167
[7]  
Chirivella I(2000)Lenograstim as support for ACE chemotherapy of small-cell lung cancer: a phase III, multicenter, randomized study Am J Clin Oncol 23 393-400
[8]  
Bermejo B(2010)Acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome in randomized controlled clinical trials of cancer chemotherapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: a systematic review J Clin Oncol 28 2914-2924
[9]  
Insa A(2008)Pegfilgrastim ± ciprofloxacin for primary prophylaxis with TAC (docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide) chemotherapy for breast cancer. Results from the GEPARTRIO study Ann Oncol 19 292-298
[10]  
Crawford J(2003)Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741 J Clin Oncol 21 1431-1439