Task offloading in Internet of Things based on the improved multi-objective aquila optimizer

被引:0
作者
Masoud Nematollahi
Ali Ghaffari
Abbas Mirzaei
机构
[1] Islamic Azad University,Department of Management Information System, Qazvin Branch
[2] Islamic Azad University,Department of Computer Engineering, Tabriz Branch
[3] Istinye University,Computer Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences
[4] Islamic Azad University,Department of Computer Engineering, Ardabil Branch
来源
Signal, Image and Video Processing | 2024年 / 18卷
关键词
Internet of Things; Task offloading; Aquila optimizer; Multi-objective optimization; Opposition-based learning;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Internet of Things (IoT) is a network of tens of billions of physical devices that are all connected to each other. These devices often have sensors or actuators, small microprocessors and ways to communicate. With the expansion of the IoT, the number of portable and mobile devices has increased significantly. Due to resource constraints, IoT devices are unable to complete tasks in full. To overcome this challenge, IoT devices must transfer tasks created in the IoT environment to cloud or fog servers. Fog computing (FC) is a computing paradigm that bridges the gap between the cloud and IoT devices and has lower latency compared to cloud computing. An algorithm for task offloading should have smart ways to make the best use of FC resources and cut down on latency. In this paper, an improved multi-objective Aquila optimizer (IMOAO) equipped with a Pareto front is proposed to task offloading from IoT devices to fog nodes with the aim of reducing the response time. To improve the MOAO algorithm, opposition-based learning (OBL) is used to diversify the population and discover optimal solutions. The IMOAO algorithm has been evaluated by the number of tasks and the number of fog nodes in order to reduce the response time. The results show that the average response time and failure rate obtained by IMOAO algorithm are lower compared to particle swarm optimization (PSO) and firefly algorithm (FA). Also, the comparisons show that the IMOAO model has a lower response time compared to multi-objective bacterial foraging optimization (MO-BFO), ant colony optimization (ACO), particle swarm optimization (PSO) and FA.
引用
收藏
页码:545 / 552
页数:7
相关论文
共 261 条
  • [31] Li Z(2021)1-bit massive MIMO transmission: embracing interference with symbol-level precoding IEEE Commun. Mag. 187 53-165
  • [32] Cheng X(2022)Broadband cancellation method in an adaptive co-site interference cancellation system Int. J. Electron. 21 27140-8050
  • [33] Wu L(2023)A fuzzy delay-bandwidth guaranteed routing algorithm for video conferencing services over SDN networks," Multimed. Tools and Appl. 53 141-171
  • [34] Lv Z(2022)Path extension similarity link prediction method based on matrix algebra in directed networks Comput. Commun. 16 8037-998
  • [35] Song H(2021)Transceiver optimization for wireless powered time-division duplex MU-MIMO systems: non-robust and robust designs IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. 63 162-563
  • [36] Zhang K(2020)Applying graph-based differential grouping for multiobjective large-scale optimization Swarm Evol. Comput. 8 983-1704
  • [37] Xiong Z(2023)Neural architecture search as multiobjective optimization benchmarks: problem formulation and performance assessment," IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 10 107250-17
  • [38] Kamalinia A(2023)Multi-objective parallel task offloading and content caching in D2D-aided MEC networks IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput. 9 165-4261
  • [39] Ghaffari A(2019)Multiobjective 3-D topology optimization of next-generation wireless data center network IEEE Trans. Industr. Inf. 25 548-10190
  • [40] Li J(2021)A memetic algorithm based on two_Arch2 for multi-depot heterogeneous-vehicle capacitated arc routing problem Swarm Evol. Comput. 32 1683-3617