Heterogeneity, collective action and management sustainability in common property forest resources: Case study from the Indian state Odisha

被引:3
作者
Pradhan A.K. [1 ]
Patra R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Indira Global Business School, S. No. 64/65, Gat No. 276, At Post: Parandwadi, Taluka Mawal, Pune
[2] Government Science College, Chatrapur, Ganjam
关键词
Common property resources (CPRs); Environmental degradation; Forest resources; Heterogeneity; Homogeneity; Management group; Natural resources; Over exploitation; Renewable resources; Resource management;
D O I
10.1007/s10668-012-9422-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Several studies have revealed that the presence of heterogeneity amongst the user groups of common property natural resources considerably affects the effectiveness of resource management and their sustainable use. Primary research conducted in six sample villages from three districts of the Indian state Odisha has found that heterogeneity in economic and social dimensions amongst the members of the management committee acts as major determinants in respect of common property forest resource management. The findings of this piece of work reveal that common property forests are best managed in the villages where the management committee is homogeneous by both social and economic considerations; better managed where the committee members are economically homogeneous but socially heterogeneous; and least managed where the members are socially homogeneous but economically heterogeneous. The same result has been obtained from the composite index developed for the user group's assessment about the functioning of the forest management institutions in the three study districts of the state Odisha. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
引用
收藏
页码:979 / 997
页数:18
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Agrawal, A., The Community versus the market and the state (1996) Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 9 (1), pp. 1-15
  • [2] Antinori, C., Bray, D.B., Community forest enterprises as entrepreneurial firms: Economic and institutional perspectives from Mexico (2005) World Development, 33 (9), pp. 1529-1543
  • [3] Arnold, J.E.M., (1998) Managing Forests as Common Property, FAO Forestry Paper 136, , Rome: FAO
  • [4] Behera, B., Institutional Dynamics and Natural Resource Management: A Study of JFM in AP (2008) Journal of Rural Development, 27 (4), pp. 575-600
  • [5] Berkes, F., (1989) Common Property Resources: Ecology and Community Based Sustainable Development, , London: Belhaven Press
  • [6] Bray, D.B., Antinori, C., Torres-Rojo, J.M., The Mexican model of community forest management: The role of agrarian policy, forest policy and entrepreneurial organization (2006) Forest Policy and Economics, 8 (4), pp. 470-484
  • [7] Bromley, D.W., (1991) Environment and Economy: Property Rights and Public Policy, , Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
  • [8] Cheung, S.N., The structure of a contract and the theory of a non-exclusive resource (1970) Journal of Law and Economics, 13, pp. 49-70
  • [9] Chopra, C., Kadekodi, G.K., Murthy, M.N., People's participation and common property resources (1989) Economic and Political Weekly, 24, pp. 189-195
  • [10] Demsetz, H., Towards a theory of property rights (1967) American Economic Review, 52 (2), pp. 347-379