Teaching vocabulary with students with learning disabilities using classwide peer tutoring and constant time delay

被引：23

作者：

Hughes T.A. ^{[1
]}

Fredrick L.D. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Education, University of Minnesota, Duluth

[2] Department of Educational Psychology and Special Education, Georgia State University, Atlanta

来源：

Journal of Behavioral Education | 2006年 / 15卷 / 1期

关键词：

Classwide peer tutoring; Constant time delay; Learning disabilities; Vocabulary skills;

D O I：

10.1007/s10864-005-9003-5

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

This study examined the effectiveness and efficiency of combining classwide peer tutoring (CWPT) and constant time delay (CTD) on the academic performance of 3 students with learning disabilities (LD) and 15 students without LD enrolled in an inclusive sixth-grade language arts class. Treatment integrity checklists were used to measure the extent to which the tutors with LD used the constant time delay procedure correctly. A multiple-probe design across behaviors replicated across students was used to examine the effectiveness of the CTD peer tutoring procedures. The results indicated that students with LD reliably implemented the CTD peer tutoring procedures with a high degree of treatment integrity. When implemented by students without LD, the procedures were effective and efficient for teaching targeted vocabulary words to students with LD. Similarly, students without LD mastered the targeted vocabulary words when tutored by peers with LD and by peers without LD using the CTD peer tutoring procedures. Additionally, students with LD and without LD maintained the targeted vocabulary words over time, generalized the words across context, and generalized the CTD peer tutoring procedures across content. Finally, measures of social validity indicate that students and teachers involved in this study were satisfied with the CTD peer tutoring procedures. © 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

引用

页码：1 / 23

页数：22

共 39 条

[1]

Alberto P.A., Troutman A.C., Applied Behavior Analysis for Teachers (5th Ed.), (1999)

[2]

Beck I.L., Perfetti C.A., McKeown M.G., The effects of long-term vocabulary instruction on lexical access and reading comprehension, Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, pp. 506-521, (1982)

[3]

Beirne-Smith M., Peer tutoring in arithmetic for children with learning disabilities, Exceptional Children, 57, pp. 330-337, (1991)

[4]

Brophy J.E., Good T.L., Teacher behavior and student achievement, Handbook of Research on Teacher 3rd Ed., pp. 328-375, (1986)

[5]

Browder D.M., Hines C., McCarthy L.J., Fees J., A treatment package for increasing sight word recognition for use in daily living skills, Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 19, pp. 191-200, (1984)

[6]

Carta J.J., Greenwood C.R., Dinwiddie G., Kohler F.W., Delquadri J., The Jumper Gardens Classwide Peer Tutoring Programs for Spelling, Math, and Reading, (1987)

[7]

Delquadri J., Greenwood C.R., Stretton K., Hall R.V., The peer tutoring game: A classroom procedure for increasing opportunity to respond and spelling performance, Education and Treatment of Children, 6, pp. 225-239, (1983)

[8]

Delquadri J., Greenwood C.R., Whotton D., Carta J.J., Hall R.V., Classwide peer tutoring, Exceptional Children, 52, pp. 535-542, (1986)

[9]

Doyle P.M., Wolery M., Ault M.J., Gast D.L., System of least prompts: A review of procedural parameters, Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 13, pp. 28-110, (1988)

[10]

Dunn L.M., Markwardt F.C., Peabody Individual Achievement Test, (1970)

← 1 2 3 4 →