Does micro/nano biochar always good to phytoremediation? A case study from multiple metals contaminated acidic soil using Salix jiangsuensis '172'

被引:1
作者
Xiao J. [1 ]
Li X. [1 ]
Cao Y. [1 ]
Chen G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Research Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Fuyang district, Zhejiang, Hangzhou
来源
Carbon Research | 2023年 / 2卷 / 01期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Acidic clay soils; Biochar; Heavy metal; Organic amendment; Willow;
D O I
10.1007/s44246-023-00053-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Biochar amendments have shown great superiority in reduction of heavy metals (HM) toxicity and soil amelioration in severely contaminated mining areas, which suggested to facilitate vegetation rehabilitation using fast-growing trees. Bone biochar (BC) and ball-milled bone biochar (MBC) were fabricated by pyrolyzing bone meal at 600°C followed by eco-friendly wet-milling techniques. The effect of BC and MBC application (0, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 and 4.0 wt%) on soil properties, plant growth and metal accumulation of Salix jiangsuensis '172' (SJ-172) in multi-metal (Cu, Pb, Cd and Mn)-contaminated acid clay soil was investigated in a 150-day pot experiment. The results showed that BC and MBC considerably improved the survival rate of SJ-172 when the application rate was larger than 1.0%. MBC displayed outstanding performance in reducing HMs bioavailability and improving N and P soil fertility, while BC enhanced the reduction in acidity and increase in K supply. Interestingly, BC enhanced HMs accumulation (Cd 115.23%, Pb 161.82%, Mn 285.23% and 219.29% Cu at 4% application rate) by SJ-172 compared with MBC. Taken together, the good performance of BC in enhancing HMs accumulation in SJ-172 indicated that it is a promising amendment for phytoremediation of clay soils, while MBC can be utilized as an excellent amendment for HMs stabilization. Graphical Abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.] © 2023, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 98 条
[1]  
Abdin Y., Usman A., Ok Y.S., Tsang Y.F., Al-Wabel M., Competitive sorption and availability of coexisting heavy metals in mining contaminated soil: Contrasting effects of mesquite and fishbone biochars, Environ Res, 181, (2020)
[2]  
Abel S., Peters A., Trinks S., Schonsky H., Facklam M., Wessolek G., Impact of biochar and hydrochar addition on water retention and water repellency of sandy soil, Geoderma, 202, pp. 183-191, (2013)
[3]  
Ali H., Khan E., Sajad M.A., Phytoremediation of heavy metals—concepts and applications, Chemosphere, 91, 7, pp. 869-881, (2013)
[4]  
Alkurdi S.S., Al-Juboori R.A., Bundschuh J., Hamawand I., Bone char as a green sorbent for removing health threatening fluoride from drinking water, Environ int, 127, pp. 704-719, (2019)
[5]  
Aller D., Rathke S., Laird D., Cruse R., Hatfield J., Impacts of fresh and aged biochars on plant available water and water use efficiency, Geoderma, 307, pp. 114-121, (2017)
[6]  
Antoniadis V., Levizou E., Shaheen S.M., Ok Y.S., Sebastain A., Baum C., Prasad M.N.V., Wenzel W.W., Rinklebe J., Trace elements in the soil-plant interface: phytoavailability, translocation, and phytoremediation–A review, Earth-Sci Rev, 171, pp. 621-645, (2017)
[7]  
Arrenberg A., Production models for bone char defluoridation., (2010)
[8]  
Azeem M., Ali A., Jeyasundar P.G., Li Y., Abdelrahman H., Latif A., Li R., Basta N., Li G., Shaheen S.M., Rinklebe J., Zhang Z., Bone-derived biochar improved soil quality and reduced Cd and Zn phytoavailability in a multi-metal contaminated mining soil, Environ Pollut, 277, (2021)
[9]  
Brendova K., Tlustos P., Szakova J., Biochar immobilizes cadmium and zinc and improves phytoextraction potential of willow plants on extremely contaminated soil, Plant Soil Environ, 61, 7, pp. 303-308, (2015)
[10]  
Cao Y., Ma C., Chen G., Zhang J., Xing B., Physiological and biochemical responses of Salix integra Thunb. under copper stress as affected by soil flooding, Environ. Pollut., 225, pp. 644-653, (2017)