Evidence map of studies evaluating methods for conducting, interpreting and reporting overviews of systematic reviews of interventions: Rationale and design

被引:29
作者
Lunny C. [1 ]
Brennan S.E. [1 ]
McDonald S. [1 ]
McKenzie J.E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash University, Australasian Cochrane Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, 549 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, 3004, VIC
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Evidence map; Evidenced-based methods; Overviews of systematic reviews;
D O I
10.1186/s13643-015-0178-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Overviews of systematic reviews attempt to systematically retrieve and summarise the results of multiple systematic reviews into a single document. Methods for conducting, interpreting and reporting overviews of reviews are in their infancy. To date, there has been no systematic review or evidence map examining the range of methods for overviews nor of the evidence for using these methods. The objectives of the study are to develop and populate a framework of methods that have or may be used in conducting, interpreting and reporting overviews of systematic reviews of interventions (stage I); create an evidence map of studies that have evaluated these methods (stage II); and identify and describe unique methodological challenges of overviews. Methods: The research will be undertaken in two stages. For both stages, we plan to search methods collections (e.g. Cochrane Methodology Register, Meth4ReSyn library, AHRQ Effective Health Care Program) to identify eligible studies. These searches will be supplemented by searching reference lists and citation searching. Stage I: Methods used in overviews will be identified from articles describing methods for overviews, methods studies examining a cross section/cohort of overviews, guidance documents and commentaries. The identified methods will populate a framework of available methods for conducting an overview. Two reviewers will independently code included studies to develop the framework. Thematic analysis of the coded data will be used to categorise and describe methods. Stage II: Evaluations of the performance of methods will be identified from systematic reviews of methods studies and methods studies. Evaluations will be described and mapped to the framework of methods identified in stage I. Discussion: The results of this process will be useful for mapping of methods for overviews of systematic reviews, informing guidance and identifying and prioritising method research in this field. © 2016 Lunny et al.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Caldwell D.M., Welton N.J., Ades A.E., Mixed treatment comparison analysis provides internally coherent treatment effect estimates based on overviews of reviews and can reveal inconsistency, J Clin Epidemiol, 63, pp. 875-882, (2010)
[2]  
Pieper D., Buechter R., Jerinic P., Eikermann M., Overviews of reviews often have limited rigor: a systematic review, J Clin Epidemiol, 65, 12, pp. 1267-1273, (2012)
[3]  
Edwards P., Clarke M., DiGuiseppi C., Pratap S., Roberts I., Wentz R., Identification of randomized controlled trials in systematic reviews: accuracy and reliability of screening records, Stat Med, 21, 11, pp. 1635-1640, (2002)
[4]  
Snilstveit B., Vojtkova M., Bhavsar A., Gaarder M., Evidence gap maps-a tool for promoting evidence-informed policy and prioritizing future research, Policy Research working paper, (2013)
[5]  
Pham M.T., Rajic A., Greig J.D., Sargeant J.M., Papadopoulos A., McEwen S.A., A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency, Res Synth Methods, 5, 4, pp. 371-385, (2014)
[6]  
Bragge P., Clavisi O., Turner T., Tavender E., Collie A., Gruen R.L., The global evidence mapping initiative: scoping research in broad topic areas, BMC Med Res Methodol, 11, 1, (2011)
[7]  
Schneider C., Mohsenpour A., Joos S., Bozorgmehr K., Health status of and health-care provision to asylum seekers in Germany: protocol for a systematic review and evidence mapping of empirical studies, Syst Rev, 3, (2014)
[8]  
Althuis M.D., Weed D.L., Evidence mapping: methodologic foundations and application to intervention and observational research on sugar-sweetened beverages and health outcomes, Am J Clin Nutr, 98, 3, pp. 755-768, (2013)
[9]  
McKenzie J.E., Clarke M.J., Chandler J., Why do we need evidence-based methods in Cochrane?, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 7, (2015)
[10]  
Arksey H., O'Malley L., Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework, Int J Soc Res Methodol, 8, 1, pp. 19-32, (2005)