Punishing ‘Dirty Hands’—Three Justifications

被引:0
作者
Stephen de Wijze
机构
[1] University of Manchester,Manchester Centre for Political Theory (MANCEPT), Politics
来源
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice | 2013年 / 16卷
关键词
Dirty Hands; Punishment; Justification; Michael Walzer;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Should those who get dirty hands be punished? There is strong disagreement among even those who support the existence of such scenarios. The problem arises because the paradoxical nature of dirty hands - doing wrong to do right - renders the standard normative justifications for punishment unfit for purpose. The Consequentialist, Retributivist and Communicative approaches cannot accommodate the idea that an action can be right, all things considered, but nevertheless also a categorical wrong. This paper argues that punishment is indeed appropriate for those who dirty their hands and that there are three normative justifications that can be used to support this claim. These are the justifications from ‘Catharsis’, ‘Recognition of Evil Suffered’ and ‘Causal Responsibility’. Together they provide the sui generis justifications for punishing dirty hands.
引用
收藏
页码:879 / 897
页数:18
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Cohen S(1991)Alternatives to punishment- the abolitionist case Isr Law Rev 25 729-739
  • [2] Davis M(2009)Punishment theory’s golden half century: a survey of developments from (about) 1957 to 2007 J Ethics 13 73-100
  • [3] de Wijze S(1994)Dirty hands—doing wrong to do right S Afr J Philos 13 27-33
  • [4] de Wijze S(2005)Tragic-remorse—the anguish of dirty hands Ethical Theory Moral Prac 7 453-471
  • [5] de Wijze S(2009)‘Targeted killing: a ‘dirty hands’ analysis’ Contemp Polit 15 305-320
  • [6] Digeser P(1998)Forgiveness and politics: dirty hands and imperfect procedures Polit Theor 26 700-724
  • [7] Galston W(1991)Toughness as a political virtue Soc Theor Pract 17 175-197
  • [8] Gardner J(2005)Wrongs and faults Rev Metaphy 59 95-132
  • [9] Hershenov DB(1999)Restitution and Revenge J Phil 96 79-94
  • [10] Hollis M(1982)Dirty hands Br J Polit Sci 12 385-398