The Role of Culture in the Relationship Between Religiosity and Psychological Well-being

被引:0
|
作者
Miran Lavrič
Sergej Flere
机构
[1] University of Maribor,Department of Sociology
来源
Journal of Religion and Health | 2008年 / 47卷
关键词
Religiosity; Religious orientation; Anxiety; Psychologial well-being; Cross-cultural studies;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Several measures of religious practice and religious orientation (intrinsic/extrinsic/quest) and two measures of psychological well-being (positive affect and negative affect) have been employed in a cross-cultural survey of undergraduate university students from five different cultural/religious environments: Slovenia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, the United States of America, and Japan. Results suggest that measures of exstrinsic, intrinsic, and quest religiosity are not entirely applicable in most of the cultures observed. Nevertheless, it was possible to discern abbreviated cross-culturally valid scales for each dimension. The strength and direction of the correlation between psychological well-being and a particular type of religious orientation proved to depend substantially upon culture. More importantly, the cultural environment plays a crucial role in shaping the relationship between general measures of religiosity and psychological well-being. According to the data, higher general levels of religiosity at the societal level are linked to more positive correlations between religiosity and psychological well-being. The overall picture leads to the conclusion that there is no culturally universal pattern in the relationship between measures of religiosity and psychological well-being and that the particular cultural and religious context should always be considered in studies dealing with this issue.
引用
收藏
页码:164 / 175
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The role of culture in the relationship between religiosity and psychological well-being
    Lavric, Miran
    Flere, Sergej
    JOURNAL OF RELIGION & HEALTH, 2008, 47 (02) : 164 - 175
  • [2] Mediating Role of Resilience in the Relationship Between Religiosity and Psychological Well-being in Iranian older adults
    Mohammadi, Saeideh
    Kazemi, Mahmoud
    Afrashteh, Majid Yousefi
    SALMAND-IRANIAN JOURNAL OF AGEING, 2024, 19 (02): : 176 - 189
  • [3] Religiosity and psychological well-being
    Leondari, Angeliki
    Gialamas, Vasilios
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 44 (04) : 241 - 248
  • [4] Moderating effect of religiosity on the relationship between social isolation and psychological well-being
    Momtaz, Yadollah Abolfathi
    Hamid, Tengku-Aizan
    Ibrahim, Rahimah
    Yahaya, Nurizan
    Chai, Sen Tyng
    MENTAL HEALTH RELIGION & CULTURE, 2011, 14 (02) : 141 - 156
  • [5] AN EXAMINATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING AND RELIGIOSITY IN ADOLESCENTS IN TERMS OF SOME VARIABLES
    Anustekin, Mehmet Nesim
    Kusat, Ali
    BILIMNAME, 2024, 52 (02): : 133 - 161
  • [6] Uncertainty and Well-Being in Turkish Adults: Exploring the Role of Religiosity and Psychological Symptoms
    Turk, Nuri
    Arslan, Gokmen
    Kaya, Alican
    Yildirim, Oguzhan
    JOURNAL OF RELIGION & HEALTH, 2025,
  • [7] Role of Religiosity in Psychological Well-Being Among Medical and Non-medical Students
    Saleem, Shemaila
    Saleem, Tamkeen
    JOURNAL OF RELIGION & HEALTH, 2017, 56 (04) : 1180 - 1190
  • [8] Guilt, Psychological Well-Being and Religiosity in Contemporary Cinema
    Moreno Martin, Florentino
    Fernandez-Villanueva, Iciar
    Ayllon Alonso, Elena
    Medina Marina, Jose Angel
    RELIGIONS, 2022, 13 (04)
  • [9] Religiosity, adherence to traditional culture, and psychological well-being among African American elders
    Jang, Yuri
    Borenstein, Amy R.
    Chiriboga, David A.
    Phillips, Karon
    Mortimer, James A.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED GERONTOLOGY, 2006, 25 (05) : 343 - 355
  • [10] An Analysis of the Relationship Between Religiosity and Psychological Well-Being in Chilean Older People Using Structural Equation Modeling
    Beatriz Fernandez, M.
    Rosell, Javiera
    JOURNAL OF RELIGION & HEALTH, 2022, 61 (02) : 1585 - 1604