Cervical isometric strength and range of motion of elite rugby union players: A cohort study

被引:15
作者
Hamilton D.F. [1 ]
Gatherer D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University of Edinburgh, Chancellor's Building, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh
[2] Gatherer (Physiotherapy Limited), Tudor House, Aylesbury
关键词
Cervical spine; Range of motion; Rugby; Strength;
D O I
10.1186/2052-1847-6-32
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Head and neck injury is relatively common in Rugby Union. Despite this, strength and range-of-motion characteristics of the cervical spine are poorly characterised. The aim of this study was to provide data on the strength and range-of-motion of the cervical spine of professional rugby players to guide clinical rehabilitation. Methods: A cohort study was performed evaluating 27 players from a single UK professional rugby club. Cervical isometric strength and range-of-motion were assessed in 3 planes of reference. Anthropometric data was collected and multivariate regression modelling performed with a view to predicting cervical isometric strength. Results: Largest forces were generated in extension, with broadly equal isometric side flexion forces at around 90% of extension values. The forwards generated significantly more force than the backline in all parameters bar flexion. The forwards had substantially reduced cervical range-of-motion and larger body mass, with differences observed in height, weight, neck circumference and chest circumference (p < 0.002). Neck circumference was the sole predictor of isometric extension (adjusted R2 = 30.34). Conclusion: Rehabilitative training programs aim to restore individuals to pre-injury status. This work provides reference ranges for the strength and range of motion of the cervical spine of current elite level rugby players. © 2014 Hamilton and Gatherer; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Sedeaud A., Marc A., Schipman J., Tafflet M., Hager J.P., Toussaint J.F., How they won Rugby World Cup through height, mass and collective experience, Br J Sports Med, 46, (2012)
[2]  
Murray A.D., Murray I.R., Robson J., Rugby Union: faster, higher, stronger: keeping an evolving sport safe, Br J Sports Med, pp. 1-2, (2012)
[3]  
Duthie G., Pyne D., Hooper S., Applied physiology and game analysis of rugby union, Sports Med, 33, pp. 973-991, (2003)
[4]  
Quarrie K.L., Hopkins W.G., Changes in player characteristics and match activities in Bledisloe Cup rugby union from 1972 to 2004, J Sports Sci, 25, pp. 895-903, (2007)
[5]  
Palmer-Green D.S., Stokes K.A., Fuller C.W., England M., Kemp S.P., Trewartha G., Match injuries in English youth academy and schools rugby union: an epidemiological study, Am J Sports Med, 41, pp. 749-755, (2013)
[6]  
Brooks J.H.M., Kemp S.P.T., Injury-prevention priorities according to playing position in professional rugby union players, Br J Sports Med, 45, pp. 765-775, (2011)
[7]  
Torg J., Ramsey-Emrhein J., Suggested management guidelines for participation in collision activities with congenital, developmental, or post injury lesions involving the cervical spine., Med Sci Sports Exerc, 29, 7, pp. 256-272, (1997)
[8]  
Lark S.D., McCarthy P.W., Cervical range of motion and proprioception in rugby players versus non-rugby players, J Sports Sci, 25, pp. 887-894, (2007)
[9]  
Pinsault N., Anxionnaz M., Vuillerme N., Cervical joint position sense in rugby players versus non-rugby players, Phys Ther Sport, 11, pp. 66-70, (2010)
[10]  
Bottini E., Poggi E.J., Luzuriaga F., Secin F.P., Incidence and nature of the most common rugby injuries sustained in Argentina (1991-1997), Br J Sports Med, 34, pp. 94-97, (2000)