Measuring Project Performance in Consideration of Optimal Best Management Practices for Building Construction in South Korea

被引:0
作者
Hee Sung Cha
Ki Hyun Kim
机构
[1] Ajou University,Dept. of Architectural Engineering
来源
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering | 2018年 / 22卷
关键词
Best Management Practice (BMP); Project characteristics; Performance Measurement System (PMS); performance prediction; quantitative analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A variety of Performance Measurement Systems (PMS) are aimed to provide owners and contractors with sound decision-making by identifying the Best Management Practices (BMP). Most of them, however, are not effectively linked with project characteristics (i.e., project type, owner requirement, and/or project circumstances). Furthermore, a continuous feedback system is necessary in order to pin-point “how-to” solutions for the subject project. Compared to the conventional PMS, this study is focused on; (1) identifying, if any, quantifiable relationships among project characteristics, project performance, and BMP; (2) developing a systematic framework for predicting the performance level of the subject project; and (3) validating the feedback algorithm by detecting the most suitable management practices for a given construction project. Although the proposed system is limited to Korean building construction industry, the main contribution of this research is twofold. First, this study has conducted the first-ever empirical analysis by quantifying the project performance and selecting the optimal BMP in consideration of project characteristics. Second, the continuous feedback approach in the field of PMS is proven by effectively diagnosing the vulnerability of the project in terms of the various types of project performance.
引用
收藏
页码:1614 / 1625
页数:11
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
Ahadzie D. K.(2008)A model for predicting the performance of project managers at the construction phase of mass house building projects ASCE J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 134 618-629
[2]  
Proverbs D. G.(1996)Modeling project performance for decision making ASCE J. Constr.Eng. Manage. 122 265-273
[3]  
Olomolaiye P. O.(1986)Engineering productivity management and performance measurement ASCE J. Manage. Engr. 2 141-147
[4]  
Alarcon L. F.(2004)Performance measurement in construction ASCE J. Manage. Engr. 20 42-50
[5]  
Ashley D. B.(2006)Characteristics for leveraging value management processes on capital facility projects ASCE Journal of Mgmt. Engr. 22 135-147
[6]  
Armentrout D. R.(2011)Predicting project cost performance level by assessing risk factors of building construction Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering 10 437-444
[7]  
Bassioni H. A.(2011)Quantitative approach for project performance measurement on building construction in South Korea KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 15 1319-1328
[8]  
Price A. D. F.(2009)Measuring performance of the Malaysian construction industry Constr. Manage. Econ. 27 1231-1244
[9]  
Hassan T. M.(2010)A Study of project characteristics and project performance level of difficulty KICEM Journal of Construction Engineering & Management 11 78-88
[10]  
Cha H. S.(2016)Developing a cost normalization framework for phase-based performance assessment of construction projects Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 43 1075-1086